Problem:

Certain Insights Advisor features differentiate between RHEL and OCP advisor

Goal:

Address top priority UI misalignments between RHEL and OCP advisor. Address UI features dropped from Insights ADvisor for OCP GA.

Scope:

Specific tasks and priority of them tracked in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CCXDEV-7432

Managing PVs at scale for a fleet creates difficulties where "one size does not fit all". The ability for SRE to deploy prometheus with PVs and have retention based an on a desired size would enable easier management of these volumes across the fleet. 

The prometheus-operator exposes retentionSize.

This is a feature request to enable this configuration option via CMO cluster-monitoring-config ConfigMap.

cc Simon Pasquier  

Problem Alignment

The Problem

Today, all configuration for setting individual, for example, routing configuration is done via a single configuration file that only admins have access to. If an environment uses multiple tenants and each tenant, for example, has different systems that they are using to notify teams in case of an issue, then someone needs to file a request w/ an admin to add the required settings.

That can be bothersome for individual teams, since requests like that usually disappear in the backlog of an administrator. At the same time, administrators might get tons of requests that they have to look at and prioritize, which takes them away from more crucial work.

We would like to introduce a more self service approach whereas individual teams can create their own configuration for their needs w/o the administrators involvement.

Last but not least, since Monitoring is deployed as a Core service of OpenShift there are multiple restrictions that the SRE team has to apply to all OSD and ROSA clusters. One restriction is the ability for customers to use the central Alertmanager that is owned and managed by the SRE team. They can't give access to the central managed secret due to security concerns so that users can add their own routing information.

High-Level Approach

Provide a new API (based on the Operator CRD approach) as part of the Prometheus Operator that allows creating a subset of the Alertmanager configuration without touching the central Alertmanager configuration file.

Please note that we do not plan to support additional individual webhooks with this work. Customers will need to deploy their own version of the third party webhooks.

Goal & Success

• Allow users to deploy individual configurations that allow setting up Alertmanager for their needs without an administrator.

Solution Alignment

Key Capabilities

• As an OpenShift administrator, I want to control who can CRUD individual configuration so that I can make sure that any unknown third person can touch the central Alertmanager instance shipped within OpenShift Monitoring.
• As a team owner, I want to deploy a routing configuration to push notifications for alerts to my system of choice.

Key Flows

Team A wants to send all their important notifications to a specific Slack channel.

• Administrator gives permission to Team A to allow creating a new configuration CR in their individual namespace.
• Team A creates a new configuration CR.
• Team A configures what alerts should go into their Slack channel.
• Open Questions & Key Decisions (optional)
• Do we want to improve anything inside the developer console to allow configuration?

Copy/paste from [_https://github.com/openshift-cs/managed-openshift/issues/60_]

Which service is this feature request for?
OpenShift Dedicated and Red Hat OpenShift Service on AWS

What are you trying to do?
Allow ROSA/OSD to integrate with AWS Managed Prometheus.

Describe the solution you'd like
Remote-write of metrics is supported in OpenShift but it does not work with AWS Managed Prometheus since AWS Managed Prometheus requires AWS SigV4 auth.

• Note that Prometheus supports AWS SigV4 since v2.26 and OpenShift 4.9 uses v2.29.

Describe alternatives you've considered
There is the workaround to use the "AWS SigV4 Proxy" but I'd think this is not properly supported by RH.
https://mobb.ninja/docs/rosa/cluster-metrics-to-aws-prometheus/

Additional context
The customer wants to use an open and portable solution to centralize metrics storage and analysis. If they also deploy to other clouds, they don't want to have to re-configure. Since most clouds offer a Prometheus service (or it's easy to self-manage Prometheus), app migration should be simplified.

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Feature Template descriptions and documentation.

Feature Overview.

Early customer feedback is that they see SNO as a great solution covering smaller footprint deployment, but are wondering what is the evolution story OpenShift is going to provide where more capacity or high availability are needed in the future.

While migration tooling (moving workload/config to new cluster) could be a mid-term solution, customer desire is not to include extra hardware to be involved in this process.

 For Telecommunications Providers, at the Far Edge they intend to start small and then grow. Many of these operators will start with a SNO-based DU deployment as an initial investment, but as DUs evolve, different segments of the radio spectrum are added, various radio hardware is provisioned and features delivered to the Far Edge, the Telecommunication Providers desire the ability for their Far Edge deployments to scale up from 1 node to 2 nodes to n nodes. On the opposite side of the spectrum from SNO is MMIMO where there is a robust cluster and workloads use HPA.

Goals

• Provide the capability to expand a single replica control plane topology to host more workloads capacity - add worker
• Provide the capability to expand a single replica control plane to be a highly available control plane
• To satisfy MMIMO Telecommunications providers will want the ability to scale a SNO to a multi-node cluster that can support HPA.
• Telecommunications providers do not want workload (DU specifically) downtime when migrating from SNO to a multi-node cluster.
• Telecommunications providers wish to be able to scale from one to two or more nodes to support a variety of radio hardware.
• Support CP scaling (CP HA) for 2 node cluster, 3 node cluster and n node cluster. As the number of nodes in the cluster increases so does the failure domain of the cluster. The cluster is now supporting more cell sectors and therefore has more of a need for HA and resiliency including the cluster CP.

Requirements

• TBD

(Optional) Use Cases

This Section:

• Main success scenarios - high-level user stories
• Alternate flow/scenarios - high-level user stories
• ...

Questions to answer…

• ...

Out of Scope

• …

Background, and strategic fit

This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

Assumptions

• ...

Customer Considerations

• ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

• What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
• Does this feature have doc impact?
• New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
• If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
• What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
• How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
• What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
• Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
• What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

Feature Overview

• As an infrastructure owner, I want a repeatable method to quickly deploy the initial OpenShift cluster.

• As an infrastructure owner, I want to install the first (management, hub, “cluster 0”) cluster to manage other (standalone, hub, spoke, hub of hubs) clusters.

Goals

• Enable customers and partners to successfully deploy a single “first” cluster in disconnected, on-premises settings

Requirements

4.11 MVP Requirements

• Customers and partners needs to be able to download the installer
• Enable customers and partners to deploy a single “first” cluster (cluster 0) using single node, compact, or highly available topologies in disconnected, on-premises settings
• Installer must support advanced network settings such as static IP assignments, VLANs and NIC bonding for on-premises metal use cases, as well as DHCP and PXE provisioning environments.
• Installer needs to support automation, including integration with third-party deployment tools, as well as user-driven deployments.
• In the MVP automation has higher priority than interactive, user-driven deployments.
• For bare metal deployments, we cannot assume that users will provide us the credentials to manage hosts via their BMCs.
• Installer should prioritize support for platforms None, baremetal, and VMware.
• The installer will focus on a single version of OpenShift, and a different build artifact will be produced for each different version.
• The installer must not depend on a connected registry; however, the installer can optionally use a previously mirrored registry within the disconnected environment.

Use Cases

• As a Telco partner engineer (Site Engineer, Specialist, Field Engineer), I want to deploy an OpenShift cluster in production with limited or no additional hardware and don’t intend to deploy more OpenShift clusters [Isolated edge experience].
• As a Enterprise infrastructure owner, I want to manage the lifecycle of multiple clusters in 1 or more sites by first installing the first  (management, hub, “cluster 0”) cluster to manage other (standalone, hub, spoke, hub of hubs) clusters [Cluster before your cluster].
• As a Partner, I want to package OpenShift for large scale and/or distributed topology with my own software and/or hardware solution.
• As a large enterprise customer or Service Provider, I want to install a “HyperShift Tugboat” OpenShift cluster in order to offer a hosted OpenShift control plane at scale to my consumers (DevOps Engineers, tenants) that allows for fleet-level provisioning for low CAPEX and OPEX, much like AKS or GKE [Hypershift].
• As a new, novice to intermediate user (Enterprise Admin/Consumer, Telco Partner integrator, RH Solution Architect), I want to quickly deploy a small OpenShift cluster for Poc/Demo/Research purposes.

Questions to answer…

Out of Scope

Out of scope use cases (that are part of the Kubeframe/factory project):

• As a Partner (OEMs, ISVs), I want to install and pre-configure OpenShift with my hardware/software in my disconnected factory, while allowing further (minimal) reconfiguration of a subset of capabilities later at a different site by different set of users (end customer) [Embedded OpenShift].
• As an Infrastructure Admin at an Enterprise customer with multiple remote sites, I want to pre-provision OpenShift centrally prior to shipping and activating the clusters in remote sites.

Background, and strategic fit

• This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

Assumptions

1. The user has only access to the target nodes that will form the cluster and will boot them with the image presented locally via a USB stick. This scenario is common in sites with restricted access such as government infra where only users with security clearance can interact with the installation, where software is allowed to enter in the premises (in a USB, DVD, SD card, etc.) but never allowed to come back out. Users can't enter supporting devices such as laptops or phones.
2. The user has access to the target nodes remotely to their BMCs (e.g. iDrac, iLo) and can map an image as virtual media from their computer. This scenario is common in data centers where the customer provides network access to the BMCs of the target nodes.
3. We cannot assume that we will have access to a computer to run an installer or installer helper software.

Customer Considerations

• ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

• What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
• Does this feature have doc impact?
• New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
• If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
• What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
• How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
• What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
• Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
• What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

References

• Bootable Ephemeral Installer Image for Disconnected Cluster 0 Deployments

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Feature Template descriptions and documentation.
<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Feature --->
<--- Remove the descriptive text as appropriate --->

Feature Overview

• As RH OpenShift Product Owners, we want to enable new providers/platforms/service with varying levels of capabilities and integration with minimal reliance on OpenShift Engineering.
• As a new provider/platform partner, I want to enable my solution (hardware and/or software) with OpenShift with minimal effort.

Problem

• It is currently challenging for us to enable new platforms / providers without taking the heavy burden on doing the platform specific development ourselves.

Goals

• We want to enable the long-tail new platforms/providers to expand our reach into new markets and/or support new use cases.
• We want to remove strict dependencies we have on Engineering teams to review, support and test new providers.
• We want to lower the effort required for onboarding new platforms/providers.
• We want to enable new platform/providers to self-certify.
• We want to define tiered model for provider/platform integration that delineates ownership and responsibilities throughout new provider/platform development lifecycle and support model.
• We want to reduce time to onboard new provider/platform – ideally to a single release.
• We want to maintain consistent customer experience across all providers/platforms.

Requirements

• Step-by-step guide on how to add a new platform/provider for each tier
• Certification tool for partner to self-certify
• Certification tool results for (at least) each Y/minor release submitted by partner to Red Hat for acknowledgement
• DCI program to enable partners to run CI with OpenShift on their platform
• Well documented, accessible, and up-to-date test suites for providing the test coverage of the partner
• CI includes upgrade testing of OpenShift with partner's components
• Partner component upgrade failure should not block OpenShift upgrade
• Partner code is available in repositories in the openshift org on github with an open source license compatible with OpenShift

(Optional) Use Cases

This Section:

• Main success scenarios - high-level user stories
• Alternate flow/scenarios - high-level user stories
• ...

Questions to answer…

• ...

Out of Scope

• …

Background, and strategic fit

This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

Assumptions

• ...

Customer Considerations

• ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

• What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
• Does this feature have doc impact?
• New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
• If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
• What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
• How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
• What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
• Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
• What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

References

• [ Notes - OpenShift Everywhere - Onboarding new providers/platforms|https://www.google.com/url?q=[https://docs.google.com/document/d/1M1zLG2-wmkeCWTS8omN5G8vsDKvDeZfmegsi7cCVh-U/edit?usp%3Dsharing&sa=D&source=calendar&ust=1641920246517943&usg=AOvVaw2ZIl_XuE7OsSr4wCmRjOp3]] 
• OKD Installer Architecture Brainstorming Working Group Meeting Minutes
• New-Platform Documentation Working Group Meeting Minutes

Feature Overview

Enable sharing ConfigMap and Secret across namespaces

Requirements

Questions to answer…

NA

Out of Scope

NA

Background, and strategic fit

Consumption of RHEL entitlements has been a challenge on OCP 4 since it moved to a cluster-based entitlement model compared to the node-based (RHEL subscription manager) entitlement mode. In order to provide a sufficiently similar experience to OCP 3, the entitlement certificates that are made available on the cluster (OCPBU-93) should be shared across namespaces in order to prevent the need for cluster admin to copy these entitlements in each namespace which leads to additional operational challenges for updating and refreshing them. 

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:
 * What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
 * Does this feature have doc impact?
 * New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
 * If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
 * What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
 * How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
 * What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
 * Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
 * What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

Feature Overview

Customers are asking for improvements to the upgrade experience (both over-the-air and disconnected). This is a feature tracking epics required to get that work done.  

Goals

1. Have an option to do upgrades in more discrete steps under admin control. Specifically, these steps are: 
   • Control plane upgrade
   • Worker nodes upgrade
   • Workload enabling upgrade (i..e. Router, other components) or infra nodes
2. OTA-922 - Better able to show the progress made in each discrete step 
3. Better visibility into any errors during the upgrades and documentation of what they error means and how to recover. 
4. OTA-700 Reduce False Positives (such as Degraded) 
5. An user experience around an end-2-end back-up and restore after a failed upgrade 
6. MCO-530 - Support in Telemetry for the discrete steps of upgrades 
7. OTA-455 - Support for z-stream rollbacks 
    
8. OTA-810  - Better Documentation: 
   • Backup procedures before upgrades. 
   • More control over worker upgrades (with tagged pools between user Vs admin)
   • The kinds of pre-upgrade tests that are run, the errors that are flagged and what they mean and how to address them. 
   • Better explanation of each discrete step in upgrades, and what each CVO Operator is doing and potential errors, troubleshooting and mitigating actions.

References

• OpenShift Upgrades Customer Issues Discussion -6/22/2023
• Select Customer Experiences and Feedback on Upgrades

Feature Overview

We drive OpenShift cross-market customer success and new customer adoption with constant improvements and feature additions to the existing capabilities of our OpenShift Core Networking (SDN and Network Edge). This feature captures that natural progression of the product.

Goals

• Feature enhancements (performance, scale, configuration, UX, ...)
• Modernization (incorporation and productization of new technologies)

Requirements

• Core Networking Stability
• Core Networking Performance and Scale
• Core Neworking Extensibility (Multus CNIs)
• Core Networking UX (Observability)
• Core Networking Security and Compliance

In Scope

• Network Edge (ingress, DNS, LB)
• SDN (CNI plugins, openshift-sdn, OVN, network policy, egressIP, egress Router, ...)
• Networking Observability

Out of Scope

There are definitely grey areas, but in general:

• CNV
• Service Mesh
• CNF

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

• What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
• Does this feature have doc impact?
• New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
• If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
• What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
• How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
• What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
• Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
• What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

tldr: three basic claims, the rest is explanation and one example

1. We cannot improve long term maintainability solely by fixing bugs.
2. Teams should be asked to produce designs for improving maintainability/debugability.
3. Specific maintenance items (or investigation of maintenance items), should be placed into planning as peer to PM requests and explicitly prioritized against them.

While bugs are an important metric, fixing bugs is different than investing in maintainability and debugability. Investing in fixing bugs will help alleviate immediate problems, but doesn't improve the ability to address future problems. You (may) get a code base with fewer bugs, but when you add a new feature, it will still be hard to debug problems and interactions. This pushes a code base towards stagnation where it gets harder and harder to add features.

One alternative is to ask teams to produce ideas for how they would improve future maintainability and debugability instead of focusing on immediate bugs. This would produce designs that make problem determination, bug resolution, and future feature additions faster over time.

I have a concrete example of one such outcome of focusing on bugs vs quality. We have resolved many bugs about communication failures with ingress by finding problems with point-to-point network communication. We have fixed the individual bugs, but have not improved the code for future debugging. In so doing, we chase many hard to diagnose problem across the stack. The alternative is to create a point-to-point network connectivity capability. this would immediately improve bug resolution and stability (detection) for kuryr, ovs, legacy sdn, network-edge, kube-apiserver, openshift-apiserver, authentication, and console. Bug fixing does not produce the same impact.

We need more investment in our future selves. Saying, "teams should reserve this" doesn't seem to be universally effective. Perhaps an approach that directly asks for designs and impacts and then follows up by placing the items directly in planning and prioritizing against PM feature requests would give teams the confidence to invest in these areas and give broad exposure to systemic problems.

Relevant links:

• Documentation:
  • Edge Diagnostics Scratchpad, our team's internal diagnostic guide.
  • Troubleshooting OCP networking issues - The complete guide, the SDN team's diagnostic guide.
  • Linux Performance, Brendan Gregg's guide to analyzing Linux performance issues.
  • RFC: A proper feedback loop on Alerts.
  • OpenShift Router Reload Technical Overview on Access.
  • Performance Scaling HAProxy with OpenShift on Access.
  • How to collect worker metrics to troubleshoot CPU load, memory pressure and interrupt issues and networking on worker nodes in OCP 4 on Access.
  • OpenShift Performance and Scale Knowledge Base on Mojo, results from OpenShift scalability testing.
  • Scalability and performance, OCP 4.5 documentation about the router's currently known scalability limits.
  • Scaling OpenShift Container Platform HAProxy Router, OCP 3.11 documentation about the manual performance configuration that was possible in OCP 3.
  • Timing web requests with cURL and Chrome from the Cloudflare blog.
  • tcpdump advanced filters, some useful tcpdump commands.
  • OpenShift SDN - Networking, OCP 3.11 documentation on the SDN (useful background reading).
  • Ingress Operator and Controller Status Conditions, design document for improved status condition reporting.
  • Observability tips for HAProxy, a slide deck by Willy Tarreau.
  • Interesting Traces - Out of Order versus Retransmissions, analysis using tshark.
  • The PCP Book: A Complete Documentation of Performance Co-Pilot, by Yogesh Babar.
  • Debugging kernel networking bug, brief guide to using SystemTap on RHCOS.
  • Troubleshooting throughput issues from the OCP 4.5 documentation.
  • Troubleshooting OpenShift Clusters and Workloads.
  • Red Hat Enterprise Linux Network Performance Tuning Guide (PDF).
  • openshift/enhancements#289 stability: point to point network check, a diagnostic built into the kube-apiserver operator.
• Diagnostic tools:
  • dropwatch to watch for packet drops.
  • ethtool to check NIC configuration.
  • iovisor/bcc: BCC - Tools for BPF-based Linux IO analysis, networking, monitoring, and more to trace and diagnose various issues in the networking stack.
  • r-curler to gather timing information about HTTP/HTTPS connections.
  • route-monitor, to monitor routes for reachability.
  • hping(3), a programmable packet generator.
  • OpenTracing / Jaeger in OpenShift.
  • node-problem-detector, a possible integration point for new diagnostics.
  • Using SystemTap by Brendan Gregg.
  • DTrace SystemTap cheatsheet (PDF).
• Visualization and more sophisticated diagnostic tools:
  • eldadru/ksniff, kubectl plugin for tcpdump & Wireshark.
  • ironcladlou/ditm, Dan's "Dan in the Middle" tool.
  • Skydive, network diagnostic and visualization tool.
  • ali, a "load testing tool capable of performing real-time analysis" with visualization.
• Testing tools:
  • stress-ng, a general stress-loading tool (CPU, filesystem, network, ...).
  • mb, the networking benchmarking tool written and used by Jiri Mencak from our Perf+Scale team.
• Case studies:
  • BZ1763206 is an example of diagnosing DNS latency/timeouts.
  • BZ1829779 Investigation details the diagnosis of route latency.
  • BZ1845545 is an example of diagnosing misconfigured DNS for an external LB.
  • Debugging network stalls on Kubernetes, from the GitHub Blog, about diagnosing Kubernetes performance issues related to ksoftirqd.

Feature Overview

• This Section:* High-Level description of the feature ie: Executive Summary

• Note: A Feature is a capability or a well defined set of functionality that delivers business value. Features can include additions or changes to existing functionality. Features can easily span multiple teams, and multiple releases.

Goals

• This Section:* Provide high-level goal statement, providing user context and expected user outcome(s) for this feature

• …

Requirements

• This Section:* A list of specific needs or objectives that a Feature must deliver to satisfy the Feature.. Some requirements will be flagged as MVP. If an MVP gets shifted, the feature shifts. If a non MVP requirement slips, it does not shift the feature.

(Optional) Use Cases

This Section: 

• Main success scenarios - high-level user stories

• Alternate flow/scenarios - high-level user stories

• ...

Questions to answer…

• ...

Out of Scope

• …

Background, and strategic fit

This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

Assumptions

• ...

Customer Considerations

• ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

• What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?

• Does this feature have doc impact?  

• New Content, Updates to existing content,  Release Note, or No Doc Impact

• If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.

• What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?

• How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?

• What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?

• Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.

• What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

Goal

Increase integration of Shipwright, Tekton, Argo CD in OpenShift GitOps with OpenShift platform and related products such as ACM.

Summary (PM+lead)

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AUTH-2 revealed that, in prinicipal, Pod Security Admission is possible to integrate into OpenShift while retaining SCC functionality.

This epic is about the concrete steps to enable Pod Security Admission by default in OpenShift

Motivation (PM+lead)

Goals (lead)

• Enable Pod Security Admission in "restricted" policy level by default
• Migrate existing core workloads to comply to the "restricted" pod security policy level

Non-Goals (lead)

• Other OpenShift workloads must be migrated by the individual responsible teams.

Deliverables

Proposal (lead)

Enhancement - https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/1010

User Stories (PM)

Dependencies (internal and external, lead)

Previous Work (lead)

Open questions (lead)

1. ...

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-authentication-operator/pull/570
• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-csi-snapshot-controller-operator/pull/120
• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-samples-operator/pull/425

Epic Goal

HyperShift provisions OpenShift clusters with externally managed control-planes. It follows a slightly different process for provisioning clusters. For example, HyperShift uses cluster API as a backend and moves all the machine management bits to the management cluster.  

Why is this important?

showing machine management/cluster auto-scaling tabs in the console is likely to confuse users and cause unnecessary side effects. 

Definition of Done

• MachineConfig and MachineConfigPool should not be present, they should be either removed or hidden when the cluster is spawned using HyperShift. 
• Cluster Settings show say the control plane is externally managed and be read-only.
• Cluster Settings -> Configuration resources should be read-only, maybe hide the tab
• Some resources should go in an allowlist. Most will be hidden
• Review getting started steps

See Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1k76JtRRHBdCCEjHPqKcYvbNVsuaGmRhWDLESWIm0mbo/edit#

Setup / Testing

It's based on the SERVER_FLAG controlPlaneTopology being set to External is really the driving factor here; this can be done in one of two ways:

• Locally via a Bridge Variable, export BRIDGE_CONTROL_PLANE_TOPOLOGY_MODE="External"
• Locally / OnCluster via modifying the window.SERVER_FLAGS.controlPlaneTopology to External in the dev tools

To test work related to cluster upgrade process, use a 4.10.3 cluster set on the candidate-4.10 upgrade channel using 4.11 frontend code.

Epic Goal

• Ensure that OCP Admin console can enable dark mode
• Mechanism for switching between light/dark mode, based on user preferences or User Settings in OCP
• Identify changes needed for OCP console's dynamic plugins
• Status as we work through the stories: https://docs.google.com/document/d/18ib0A9ZtSYo1e2aOtM2LtZcsNFs1aRCHXx6NAPsIAso/edit#

Why is this important?

• So the UX satisfies the current trands, where dark mode is becoming a standard for modern services.  

Acceptance Criteria

• OCP admin console must be rendered in a preferred mode based on `prefers-color-scheme` media query
• OCP admin console must be rendered in a preferred mode selected in the User Setting page
• Create an followup epic/story for and listing and tracking changes needed in OCP console's dynamic plugins

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. PatternFly - Dark mode PF variables

Previous Work (Optional):

1. Mike Coker has worked on a POC from the PF point of view on both the admin and dev console, and the screenshot results are listed below along with the repo branch. Also listed is a document covering some of the common issues found when putting together the admin console POC. https://github.com/mcoker/console/tree/dark-theme
   Background POC work completed for reference:

PatternFly Dark Theme Handbook: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mRYEfUoOjTsSt7hiqjbeplqhfo3_rVDO0QqMj2p67pw/edit

Admin Console -> Workloads & Pods

• Screenshots: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1BoOpXpX96_uNUhVJiEqGUCZ-JMYh1A78fXJhk3H86K8/edit#slide=id.p
• Github branch: https://github.com/mcoker/console/tree/dark-theme
• Github PR for Dark Theme WIP by Vikram: https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/10947{}

Dev Console -> Gotcha pages: Observe Dashboard and Metrics, Add, Pipelines: builder, list, log, and run

• Screenshots: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/13jagAf_JEu82hd_KpEHRmj25xCEqwImWpNufzVopuUs/edit#slide=id.p
• Github branch: https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/10815
• Evaluation: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1fBCPPb4Z1sqUDKgQkpueGe8VQZo4pBUA9PV4vnFCnDw/edit#gid=0

Open questions::

1. Who should be responsible for updating DynamicPlugins to be able to render in dark mode?

An epic we can duplicate for each release to ensure we have a place to catch things we ought to be doing regularly but can tend to fall by the wayside.

This epic contains all the Dynamic Plugins related stories for OCP release-4.11 

Epic Goal

• Track all the stories under a single epic

Acceptance Criteria

Goal

• Add the ability for users to select supported but not recommended updates.
• Refine workflow when both "upgradeable=false" and "supported-but-not-recommended" updates occur

Background
RFE: for 4.10, Cincinnati and the cluster-version operator are adding conditional updates (a.k.a. targeted edge blocking): https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OTA-267

High-level plans in https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/update/targeted-update-edge-blocking.md#update-client-support-for-the-enhanced-schema

Example of what the oc adm upgrade UX will be in https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/update/targeted-update-edge-blocking.md#cluster-administrator.

The oc implementation landed via https://github.com/openshift/oc/pull/961.

Design

• Use case 01: "supported but not recommended" occurs to the latest version:
  • Add an info icon next to the version on update path with a pop-over to explain about why updating to this version is supported, but not recommended and a link to known risks
  • Identify the difference in "recommended" versions, "supported but not recommended" versions, and "blocked" versions (upgradeable=false) in the + more modal.
  • The latest version is pre-selected in the dropdown in the update modal with an inline alert to inform users about supported-but-not-recommended version with link to known risks. Users can choose to update to another recommended versions, update to a supported-but-not-recommended one, or wait.
  • The "recommended" and "supported but not recommended" updates are separated in the dropdown.
  • If a user selects a "recommended" update, the inline alert disappears.
• Use case 02: When both "upgradeable=false" and "supported but not recommended" occur:
  • Add an alert banner to explain why users shouldn’t update to the latest version and link to how to resolve on the cluster settings details page. Users have the options to resolve the issue, update to a patch version, or wait.
  • If users open the update modal without resolving the "upgradeable=false" issue, the next recommended version is pre-selected. An expandable link "View blocked versions (#)" is included under the dropdown to show "upgradeable=false" versions with resolve link.
  • If users resolve the "upgradeable=false" issue, the cluster settings page will change to use case 01

• • Question: Priority on changing the upgradeable=false alert banner in update modal and blocked versions in dropdown

See design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Nja4whdsI5dKmQNS_rXyN8IGtRXDJ8gXuU_eSxBLMIY/edit#

See marvel: https://marvelapp.com/prototype/h3ehaa4/screen/86077932

Epic Goal

• Add telemetry so that we know how image stream features are used.

Why is this important?

• We have a long standing epic to create image streams v2. We need to better understand how image streams are used today.

Scenarios

1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

• CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
• Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
• ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

1. …

Open questions::

1. …

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Epic Goal

• Make the image registry distributed across availability zones.

Why is this important?

• The registry should be highly available and zone failsafe.

Scenarios

1. As an administrator I want to rely on a default configuration that spreads image registry pods across topology zones so that I don't suffer from a long recovery time (>6 mins) in case of a complete zone failure if all pods are impacted.

Acceptance Criteria

• CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
• Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. Pod's topologySpreadConstraints

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: https://github.com/openshift/cluster-image-registry-operator/pull/730
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Goal

Remove Jenkins from the OCP Payload.

Problem

• Jenkins images are "non-trival in size, impact experience around OCP payloads
• Security advisories cannot be handled once, but against all actively supported OCP releases, adding to response time for handling said advisories
• Some customers may now want to upgrade Jenkins as OCP upgrades (making this configurable is more ideal)

Why is this important

• This is an engineering motivated item to reduce costs so we have more cycles for strategic work
• Aside from the team itself, top level OCP architects want this to reduce the image size, improve general OCP upgrade experience
• Sends a mix message with respect to what is startegic CI/CI when Jenkins is baked into OCP, but Tekton/Pipelines is an add-on, day 2 install sort of thing

Dependencies (internal and external)

See epic linking - need alternative non payload image available to provide relatively seamless migration

Also, the EP for this is approved and merged at https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/builds/remove-jenkins-payload.md

Estimate (xs, s, m, l, xl, xxl):

Questions:

• in addition to needing the CPaaS Image available first, have we confirmed the "deprecate first, then remove" requirements?  Per grooming we've assigned Rob Gormley the task https://issues.redhat.com/browse/JKNS-274 for tracking this down.  I will be reaching out to Ben Parees (he is currently on vacation) to confirm from an OCP staff engineer / architect perspective if his approval of https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/841 is sufficient signoff from that end.

       PARTIAL ANSWER ^^:  confirmed with Ben Parees in https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C014MHHKUSF/p1646683621293839 that EP merging is currently sufficient OCP "technical leadership" approval.

Previous work

Customers

assuming none

Epic Goal

• Remove this UI from our stack that we cannot support.

Why is this important?

• Reduce support burden.
• Remove Bugzilla burden of addressing continuous CVEs found in this project.

Acceptance Criteria

• All Prometheus upstream UI links are removed
• Related documentation is updated
• Ports/routes etc configured to expose access to this UI are removed such that no configuration we provide enables access to this UI or its codepaths.
• There is no reason any CVEs found in this UI would ever require intervention by the Monitoring Team.

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. Make the Prometheus Targets information available in Console UI (https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MON-1079)

Previous Work (Optional):

1. …

Open questions::

1. …

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Epic Goal

When users configure CMO to interact with systems outside of an OpenShift cluster, we want to provide an easy way to add the cluster ID to the data send.

Why is this important?

Technically this can be achieved today, by adding an identifying label to the remote_write configuration for a given cluster. The operator adding the remote_write integration needs to take care that the label is unique over the managed fleet of clusters. This however adds management complexity. Any given cluster already has a pseudo-unique datum, that can be used for this purpose.

• Starting in 4.9 we support the Prometheus remote_write feature to send metric data to a storage integration outside of the cluster similar to our own Telemetry service.
• In Telemetry we already use the cluster ID to distinguish the various clusters.
• For users of remote_write this could add an easy way to add such distinguishing information.

Scenarios

1. An organisation with multiple OpenShift clusters want to store their metric data centralized in a dedicated system and use remote_write in all their clusters to send this data. When querying their centralized storage, metadata (here a label) is needed to separate the data of the various clusters.
2. Service providers who manage multiple clusters for multiple customers via a centralized storage system need distinguishing metadata too. See https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSD-6573 for example

Acceptance Criteria

• CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
• Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
• Document how to use this feature

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. none

Previous Work (Optional):

1. none

Open questions::

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Implementation proposal:

Expose a flag in the CMO configuration, that is false by default (keeps backward compatibility) and when set to true will add the _id label to a remote_write configuration. More specifically it will be added to the top of a remote_write relabel_config list via the replace action. This will add the label as expect, but additionally a user could alter this label in a later relabel config to suit any specific requirements (say rename the label or add additional information to the value).
The location of this flag is the remote_write Spec, so this can be set for individual remote_write configurations.

Epic Goal

• Offer the option to double the scrape intervals for CMO controlled ServiceMonitors in single node deployments
• Alternatively automatically double the same scrape intervals if CMO detects an SNO setup

The potential target ServiceMonitors are:

• kubelet
• kube-state-metrics
• node-exporter
• etcd
• openshift-state-metrics

Why is this important?

• Reduce CPU usage in SNO setups
• Specifically doubling the scrape interval is important because:

1. we are confident that this will have the least chance to interfere with existing rules. We typically have rate queries over the last 2 minutes (no shorter time window). With 30 second scrape intervals (the current default) this gives us 4 samples in any 2 minute window. rate needs at least 2 samples to work, we want another 2 for failure tolerance. Doubling the scrape interval will still give us 2 samples in most 2 minute windows. If a scrape fails, a few rule evaluations might fail intermittently.
2. We expect a measureable reduction of CPU resources (see previous work)

Scenarios

1. RAN deployments (Telco Edge) are SNO deployments. In these setups a full CMO deployment is often not needed and the default setup consumes too many resources. OpenShift as a whole has only very limited CPU cycles available and too many cycles are spend on Monitoring

Acceptance Criteria

• CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
• Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
• ...

Previous Work (Optional):

1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MON-1569

Open questions:

1. Whether doubling some scrape intervals reduces CPU usage to fit into the assigned budget

Non goals

• Allow arbitrarily long scrape intervals. This will interfere with alert and recoring rules
• Implement a global override to scrape intervals.

Problem:

This epic is mainly focused on the 4.10 Release QE activities

Goal:

1. Identify the scenarios for automation
2. Segregate the test Scenarios into smoke, Regression and other user stories
a. Update the https://docs.jboss.org/display/ODC/Automation+Status+Report
3. Align with layered operator teams for updating scripts
3. Work closely with dev team for epic automation
4. Create the automation scripts using cypress
5. Implement CI for nightly builds
6. Execute scripts on sprint basis

Why is it important?

To the track the QE progress at one place in 4.10 Release Confluence page

Use cases:

1. <case>

Acceptance criteria:

1. <criteria>

Dependencies (External/Internal):

Design Artifacts:

Exploration:

Note:

Goal:

This epic covers a number of customer requests(RFEs) as well as increases usability.

Why is it important?

Customer satisfaction as well as improved usability.

Acceptance Criteria

1. Allow user to re-arrange the resources which have ben added to nav by the user
2. Improved user experience (form based experience)
   1. Form based editing of Routes
   2. Form based creation and editing of Config Maps
   3. Form base creation of Deployments
3. Improved discovery
   1. Include Share my project on the Add page to increase discoverability
   2. NS Helm Chart Repo
      1. Add tile to Add page for discoverability
      2. Provide a form driven creation experience
      3. User should be able to switch back and forth from Form/YAML
      4. change the intro text to the below & have the link in the intro text bring up the full page form
         1. Browse for charts that help manage complex installations and upgrades. Cluster administrators can customize the content made available in the catalog. Alternatively, developers can try to configure their own custom Helm Chart repository.

Dependencies (External/Internal):

None

Exploration:

Miro board from Epic Exploration

Problem:

Currently we are only able to get limited telemetry from the Dev Sandbox, but not from any of our managed clusters or on prem clusters.

Goals:

1. Enable gathering segment telemetry whenever cluster telemetry is enabled on OSD clusters
2. Have our OSD clusters opt into telemetry by default
3. Work with PM & UX to identify additional metrics to capture in addition to what we have enabled currently on Sandbox.
4. Ability to get a single report from woopra across all of our Sandbox and OSD clusters.
5. Be able to generate a report including metrics of a single cluster or all clusters of a certain type ( sandbox, or OSD)

Why is it important?

In order to improve properly analyze usage and the user experience, we need to be able to gather as much data as possible.

Goal:
Enhance oc adm release new (and related verbs info, extract, mirror) with heterogeneous architecture support

Epic Goal

• Update image registry dependencies (Kubernetes and OpenShift) to the latest versions.

Why is this important?

• New versions usually bring improvements that are needed by the registry and help with getting updates for z-stream.

Scenarios

1. As an OpenShift engineer, I want my components to use the versions of dependencies, so that they get fixes for known issues and can be easily updated in z-stream.

Acceptance Criteria

• CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. Kubernetes 1.24

Previous Work (Optional):

1. IR-210

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>

Epic Goal

• Provide a dedicated dashboard for NVIDIA GPU usage visualization in the OpenShift Console.

Why is this important?

• Customers that use GPUs in their clusters usually have the GPU workloads as the main purpose of their cluster. As such, it makes much more sense to have the details about the usage they are doing of GPGPU resources AND CPU/RAM rather than just CPU/RAM

Scenarios

1. As an admin of a cluster dedicated to data science, I want to quickly find out how much of my very costly resources are currently in use and if things are getting queued due to lack of resources

Acceptance Criteria

• CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
• Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. The NVIDIA GPU Operator must export to prometheus the relevant data

Open questions::

1. Will NVIDIA agree to these extra data exports in their GPU Operator?

I asked Zvonko Kaiser and he seemed open to it. I need to confirm with Shiva Merla

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Description of problem:

When running node-density (245 pods/node) on a 120 node cluster, we see that there is a huge spike (~22s) in Avg pod-latency. When the spike occurs we see all the ovnkube-master pods go through a restart. 

The restart happens because of (ovnkube-master pods)

2022-08-10T04:04:44.494945179Z panic: reflect: call of reflect.Value.Len on ptr Value

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-08-09-114621

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Run node-density on a 120 node cluster

Actual results:

Spike observed in pod-latency graph ~22s

Expected results:

Steady pod-latency graph ~4s

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1266

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1329. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

etcd and kube-apiserver pods get restarted due to failed liveness probes while deleting/re-creating pods on SNO

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.10.32

How reproducible:

Not always, after ~10 attempts

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Deploy SNO with Telco DU profile applied
2. Create multiple pods with local storage volumes attached(attaching yaml manifest)
3. Force delete and re-create pods 10 times

Actual results:

etcd and kube-apiserver pods get restarted, making to cluster unavailable for a period of time

Expected results:

etcd and kube-apiserver do not get restarted

Additional info:

Attaching must-gather.

Please let me know if any additional info is required. Thank you!

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pull/943

Created attachment 1905034 [details]
Plugin page with error

Steps to reproduce:

1. Install a plugin with a page that has a runtime error. (Demo Plugin -> Dynamic Nav 1 currently has an error for me, but you can reproduce by editing any plugin and introducing an error.)
2. Observe the "something went wrong" error message.
3. Navigate to any other page (e.g. Workloads -> Pods)

Expected result:

The pods page is displayed.

Action result:

The error message persists. There is no way to clear except to refresh the browser.

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/11968

Backport clone of https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGSM-24281

openshift-4 tracking bug for telemeter-container: see the bugs linked in the "Blocks" field of this bug for full details of the security issue(s).

This bug is never intended to be made public, please put any public notes in the blocked bugs.

Impact: Moderate
Public Date: 11-Jan-2021
PM Fix/Wontfix Decision By: 04-May-2021
Resolve Bug By: 11-Jan-2022

In case the dates above are already past, please evaluate this bug in your next prioritization review and make a decision then. Remember to explicitly set CLOSED:WONTFIX if you decide not to fix this bug.

Please see the Security Errata Policy for further details: https://docs.engineering.redhat.com/x/9RBqB

• https://github.com/openshift/telemeter/pull/421

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1417. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

Egress IP is not being assigned to primary interface of node as per hostsubnet definition. The issue being observed at an Openshift cluster hosted on Disconnected AWS environment.  Following steps were performed at AWS end:

- Disconnected VPC was created and installation of Openshift was done as per documentation.
- Elastic IP could not be used as it is a disconnected environment. Customer identified a free IP from same subnet as the node and modified interface of the node to add a secondary IP.

It seems cloud.network.openshift.io/egress-ipconfig annotation is need on the node to attach IP to primary interface but its missing. From SDN POD log on the same node I  could see its complaining about 'an incomplete annotation "cloud.network.openshift.io/egress-ipconfig"'. Will share more details over comments.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Openshift 4.10.28

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create a disconnected environment on AWS
2. find a free IP from subnet where a worker node is hosted and add that as secondary  IP to NIC of that node.
3. Configure hostsubnet and netnamespace on Openshift cluster

Actual results:

- Eress IP is not being attached to primary interface of node for which hostsubnet has been configured

Expected results:

- Egress IP should get configured without any issue.

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/cloud-network-config-controller/pull/84

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12174

Description of problem:

Data race seen in unit tests:
https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/openshift_ovn-kubernetes/1448/pull-ci-openshift-ovn-kubernetes-release-4.11-unit/1604898712423763968/artifacts/test/build-log.txt

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1471

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1290

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-kube-apiserver-operator/pull/1386

Description of problem:

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/cloud-network-config-controller/pull/81

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-723. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
I have a customer who created clusterquota for one of the namespace, it got created but the values were not reflecting under limits or not displaying namespace details.
~~~
$ oc describe AppliedClusterResourceQuota
Name: test-clusterquota
Created: 19 minutes ago
Labels: size=custom
Annotations: <none>
Namespace Selector: []
Label Selector:
AnnotationSelector: map[openshift.io/requester:system:serviceaccount:application-service-accounts:test-sa]
Scopes: NotTerminating
Resource Used Hard
-------- ---- ----
~~~

WORKAROUND: They recreated the clusterquota object (cache it off, delete it, create new) after which it displayed values as expected.

In the past, they saw similar behavior on their test cluster, there it was heavily utilized the etcd DB was much larger in size (>2.5Gi), and had many more objects (at that time, helm secrets were being cached for all deployments, and keeping a history of 10, so etcd was being bombarded).

This cluster the same "symptom" was noticed however etcd was nowhere near that in size nor the amount of etcd objects and/or helm cached secrets.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): OCP 4.9

How reproducible: Occurred only twice(once in test and in current cluster)

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create ClusterQuota
2. Check AppliedClusterResourceQuota
3. The values and namespace is empty

Actual results: ClusterQuota should display the values

Expected results: ClusterQuota not displaying values

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-policy-controller/pull/96

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1549. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

The cluster-dns-operator does not reconcile the openshift-dns namespace, which has been exposed as an issue in 4.12 due to the requirement for the namespace to have pod-security labels.

If a cluster has been incrementally updated from a version less than or equal to 4.9, the openshift-dns namespace will most likely not contain the required pod-security labels since the namespace was statically created when the cluster was installed with old namespace configuration.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

Always if cluster originally installed with v4.9 or less

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install v4.9
2. Upgrade to v4.12 (incrementally if required for upgrade path)
3. openshift-dns namespace will be missing pod-security labels

Actual results:

"oc get ns openshift-dns -o yaml" will show missing pod-security labels: 

apiVersion: v1
kind: Namespace
metadata:
  annotations:
    openshift.io/node-selector: ""
    openshift.io/sa.scc.mcs: s0:c15,c0
    openshift.io/sa.scc.supplemental-groups: 1000210000/10000
    openshift.io/sa.scc.uid-range: 1000210000/10000
  creationTimestamp: "2020-05-21T19:36:15Z"
  labels:
    kubernetes.io/metadata.name: openshift-dns
    olm.operatorgroup.uid/3d42c0c1-01cd-4c55-bf88-864f041c7e7a: ""
    openshift.io/cluster-monitoring: "true"
    openshift.io/run-level: "0"
  name: openshift-dns
  resourceVersion: "3127555382"
  uid: 0fb4571e-952f-4bea-bc45-461beec54369
spec:
  finalizers:
  - kubernetes

Expected results:

pod-security labels should exist:
 
 labels:
    kubernetes.io/metadata.name: openshift-dns
    olm.operatorgroup.uid/3d42c0c1-01cd-4c55-bf88-864f041c7e7a: ""
    openshift.io/cluster-monitoring: "true"
    openshift.io/run-level: "0"
    pod-security.kubernetes.io/audit: privileged
    pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce: privileged
    pod-security.kubernetes.io/warn: privileged

Additional info:

Issue found in CI during upgrade

https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C03G7REB4JV/p1663676443155839 

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-dns-operator/pull/346

Description of problem:

To address: 'Static Pod is managed but errored" err="managed container xxx does not have Resource.Requests'

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

Already merged in https://github.com/openshift/cluster-kube-controller-manager-operator/pull/660

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-kube-controller-manager-operator/pull/667

Discovered in the must gather kubelet_service.log from https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-gcp-sdn-upgrade/1586093220087992320

It appears the guard pod names are too long, and being truncated down to where they will collide with those from the other masters.

From kubelet logs in this run:

❯ grep openshift-kube-scheduler-guard-ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-maste kubelet_service.log
Oct 28 23:58:55.693391 ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-master-1 kubenswrapper[1657]: E1028 23:58:55.693346    1657 kubelet_pods.go:413] "Hostname for pod was too long, truncated it" podName="openshift-kube-scheduler-guard-ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-master-1" hostnameMaxLen=63 truncatedHostname="openshift-kube-scheduler-guard-ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-maste"
Oct 28 23:59:03.735726 ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-master-0 kubenswrapper[1670]: E1028 23:59:03.735671    1670 kubelet_pods.go:413] "Hostname for pod was too long, truncated it" podName="openshift-kube-scheduler-guard-ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-master-0" hostnameMaxLen=63 truncatedHostname="openshift-kube-scheduler-guard-ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-maste"
Oct 28 23:59:11.168082 ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-master-2 kubenswrapper[1667]: E1028 23:59:11.168041    1667 kubelet_pods.go:413] "Hostname for pod was too long, truncated it" podName="openshift-kube-scheduler-guard-ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-master-2" hostnameMaxLen=63 truncatedHostname="openshift-kube-scheduler-guard-ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-maste"

This also looks to be happening for openshift-kube-scheduler-guard, kube-controller-manager-guard, possibly others.

Looks like they should be truncated further to make room for random suffixes in https://github.com/openshift/library-go/blame/bd9b0e19121022561dcd1d9823407cd58b2265d0/pkg/operator/staticpod/controller/guard/guard_controller.go#L97-L98

Unsure of the implications here, it looks a little scary.

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-kube-apiserver-operator/pull/1429
• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-kube-controller-manager-operator/pull/690
• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-kube-scheduler-operator/pull/458

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12107

Description of problem:

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.11

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Enable UWM + dedicated UWM Alertmanager
2. Deploy an application + service monitor + alerting rule which fires always
3. Go to the OCP dev console and silence the alert.

Actual results:
Nothing happens

Expected results:
The alert notification is muted.

Additional info:
Copied from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2100860

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-monitoring-operator/pull/1781
• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12104
• https://github.com/openshift/console-operator/pull/685

• https://github.com/openshift/etcd/pull/170

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-268. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
The linux kernel was updated:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/20/1030
to include steal

accounting

This would greatly assist in troubleshooting vSphere performance issues
caused by over-provisioned ESXi hosts.

• https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/6260
• https://github.com/openshift/machine-api-operator/pull/1081

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-669. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

This is an OCP clone of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2099794

In summary, NetworkManager reports the network as being up before the ipv6 address of the primary interface is ready and crio fails to bind to it.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/baremetal-runtimecfg/pull/192

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-6913. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-186. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
When resizing the browser window, the PipelineRun task status bar would overlap the status text that says "Succeeded" in the screenshot.

Actual results:
Status text is overlapped by the task status bar

Expected results:
Status text breaks to a newline or gets shortened by "..."

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12534

Description of problem:

Setting disableNetworkDiagnostics: true does not persist when network-operator pod gets re-created.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.11.0-rc.0

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1. $ oc patch network.operator.openshift.io/cluster --patch '{"spec":{"disableNetworkDiagnostics":true}}' --type=merge
network.operator.openshift.io/cluster patched

2. $ oc -n openshift-network-operator delete pods network-operator-9b68954c6-bclx6
pod "network-operator-9b68954c6-bclx6" deleted

3. $ oc get network.operator.openshift.io cluster -o json | jq .spec.disableNetworkDiagnostics
false

Actual results:
disableNetworkDiagnostics set to false, not set to true as configured in step 1

Expected results:
disableNetworkDiagnostics set to true

Additional info:

Attaching must-gather.

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-network-operator/pull/1530

Description of problem:

The alertmanager pod is stuck on OCP 4.11 with OVN in container Creating State

From oc describe alertmanager pod:
...
Events:
  Type     Reason                  Age                  From     Message
  ----     ------                  ----                 ----     -------
  Warning  FailedCreatePodSandBox  16s (x459 over 17h)  kubelet  (combined from similar events): Failed to create pod sandbox: rpc error: code = Unknown desc = failed to create pod network sandbox k8s_alertmanager-managed-ocs-alertmanager-0_openshift-storage_3a55ed54-4eaa-4f65-8a10-e5d21fad1ebc_0(88575547dc0b210307b89dd2bb8e379ece0962b607ac2707a1c2cf630b1aaa78): error adding pod openshift-storage_alertmanager-managed-ocs-alertmanager-0 to CNI network "multus-cni-network": plugin type="multus" name="multus-cni-network" failed (add): [openshift-storage/alertmanager-managed-ocs-alertmanager-0/3a55ed54-4eaa-4f65-8a10-e5d21fad1ebc:ovn-kubernetes]: error adding container to network "ovn-kubernetes": CNI request failed with status 400: '[openshift-storage/alertmanager-managed-ocs-alertmanager-0 88575547dc0b210307b89dd2bb8e379ece0962b607ac2707a1c2cf630b1aaa78] [openshift

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

OCP 4.11 with OVN

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Terminate the node on which alertmanager pod is running
2. pod will get stuck in container Creating state
3.

Actual results:

AlertManager pod is stuck in container Creating state

Expected results:

Alertmanager pod is ready

Additional info:

The workaround would be to terminate the alertmanager pod

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1422

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5879. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5505. The following is the description of the original issue:
—

Description of problem:

The upgradeability check in CVO is throttled (essentially cached) for a nondeterministic period of time, same as the minimal sync period computed at runtime. The period can be up to 4 minutes, determined at CVO start time as 2minutes * (0..1 + 1). We agreed with Trevor that such throttling is unnecessarily aggressive (the check is not that expensive). It also causes CI flakes, because the matching test only has 3 minutes timeout. Additionally, the non-determinism and longer throttling results makes UX worse by actions done in the cluster may have their observable effect delayed.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

discovered in 4.10 -> 4.11 upgrade jobs

How reproducible:

The test seems to flake ~10% of 4.10->4.11 Azure jobs (sippy). There does not seem to be that much impact on non-Azure jobs though which is a bit weird.

Steps to Reproduce:

Inspect the CVO log and E2E logs from failing jobs with the provided [^check-cvo.py] helper:

$ ./check-cvo.py cvo.log && echo PASS || echo FAIL

Preferably, inspect CVO logs of clusters that just underwent an upgrade (upgrades makes the original problematic behavior more likely to surface)

Actual results:

$ ./check-cvo.py openshift-cluster-version_cluster-version-operator-5b6966c474-g4kwk_cluster-version-operator.log && echo PASS || echo FAIL
FAIL: Cache hit at 11:59:55.332339 0:03:13.665006 after check at 11:56:41.667333
FAIL: Cache hit at 12:06:22.663215 0:03:13.664964 after check at 12:03:08.998251
FAIL: Cache hit at 12:12:49.997119 0:03:13.665598 after check at 12:09:36.331521
FAIL: Cache hit at 12:19:17.328510 0:03:13.664906 after check at 12:16:03.663604
FAIL: Cache hit at 12:25:44.662290 0:03:13.666759 after check at 12:22:30.995531
Upgradeability checks:           5
Upgradeability check cache hits: 12
FAIL

Note that the bug is probabilistic, so not all unfixed clusters will exhibit the behavior. My guess of the incidence rate is about 30-40%.

Expected result

$ ./check-cvo.py openshift-cluster-version_cluster-version-operator-7b8f85d455-mk9fs_cluster-version-operator.log && echo PASS || echo FAIL
Upgradeability checks:           12
Upgradeability check cache hits: 11
PASS

The actual numbers are not relevant (unless the upgradeabilily check count is zero, which means the test is not conclusive, the script warns about that), lack of failure is.

Additional info:

$ curl --silent https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.11-upgrade-from-stable-4.10-e2e-azure-upgrade/1607602927633960960/artifacts/e2e-azure-upgrade/gather-extra/artifacts/pods/openshift-cluster-version_cluster-version-operator-7b7d4b5bbd-zjqdt_cluster-version-operator.log | grep upgradeable.go
...
I1227 06:50:59.023190       1 upgradeable.go:122] Cluster current version=4.10.46
I1227 06:50:59.042735       1 upgradeable.go:42] Upgradeable conditions were recently checked, will try later.
I1227 06:51:14.024345       1 upgradeable.go:42] Upgradeable conditions were recently checked, will try later.
I1227 06:53:23.080768       1 upgradeable.go:42] Upgradeable conditions were recently checked, will try later.
I1227 06:56:59.366010       1 upgradeable.go:122] Cluster current version=4.11.0-0.ci-2022-12-26-193640

$ curl --silent https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.11-upgrade-from-stable-4.10-e2e-azure-upgrade/1607602927633960960/artifacts/e2e-azure-upgrade/openshift-e2e-test/artifacts/e2e.log | grep 'Kubernetes 1.25 and therefore OpenShift 4.12'
Dec 27 06:51:15.319: INFO: Waiting for Upgradeable to be AdminAckRequired for "Kubernetes 1.25 and therefore OpenShift 4.12 remove several APIs which require admin consideration. Please see the knowledge article https://access.redhat.com/articles/6955381 for details and instructions." ...
Dec 27 06:54:15.413: FAIL: Error while waiting for Upgradeable to complain about AdminAckRequired with message "Kubernetes 1.25 and therefore OpenShift 4.12 remove several APIs which require admin consideration. Please see the knowledge article https://access.redhat.com/articles/6955381 for details and instructions.": timed out waiting for the condition

The test passes. Also, the "Upgradeable conditions were recently checked, will try later." messages in CVO logs should never occur after a deterministic, short amount of time (I propose 1 minute) after upgradeability was checked.

I tested the throttling period in https://github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/pull/880. With the period of 15m, the test passrate was 4 of 9. Wiht the period of 1m, the test did not fail at all.

Some context in Slack thread

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/pull/885

We're seeing a slight uptick in how long upgrades are taking[1][2]. We are not 100% sure of the cause, but it looks like it started with 4.11 rc.7. There's no obvious culprits in the diff[3].

Looking at some of the jobs, we are seeing the gaps between kube-scheduler being updated and then machine-api appear to take longer. Example job run[4] showing 10+ minutes waiting for it.

TRT had a debugging session, and we have two suggestions:

• Adding logging around when CVO sees an operator version changed

• Instead of a fixed polling interval at 5 minutes (which is what we think CVO is doing), would it be possible to trigger on the CO to know when to look again? We think there could be some substantial savings on upgrade time by doing this.

[1] https://search.ci.openshift.org/graph/metrics?metric=job%3Aduration%3Atotal%3Aseconds&job=periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade&job=periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-aws-sdn-upgrade&job=periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-azure-upgrade&job=periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade&job=periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-gcp-sdn-upgrade
[2] https://sippy.dptools.openshift.org/sippy-ng/tests/4.12/analysis?test=Cluster%20upgrade.%5Bsig-cluster-lifecycle%5D%20cluster%20upgrade%20should%20complete%20in%2075.00%20minutes
[3] https://amd64.ocp.releases.ci.openshift.org/releasestream/4-stable/release/4.11.0-rc.7
[4] https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gcs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-e2e-azure-sdn-upgrade/1556865989923049472

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/pull/826

Description of problem:

Created two egressIP object, egressIPs in one egressIP object cannot be applied successfully 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-11-27-164248

How reproducible:

Frequently happen in auto case

Steps to Reproduce:

1.  Label two nodes as egress nodes
  oc get nodes -o wide
NAME                                   STATUS   ROLES    AGE    VERSION           INTERNAL-IP   EXTERNAL-IP   OS-IMAGE                                                        KERNEL-VERSION                 CONTAINER-RUNTIME
huirwang-1128a-s6j6t-master-0          Ready    master   154m   v1.24.6+5658434   10.0.0.8      <none>        Red Hat Enterprise Linux CoreOS 411.86.202211232221-0 (Ootpa)   4.18.0-372.32.1.el8_6.x86_64   cri-o://1.24.3-6.rhaos4.11.gitc4567c0.el8
huirwang-1128a-s6j6t-master-1          Ready    master   154m   v1.24.6+5658434   10.0.0.7      <none>        Red Hat Enterprise Linux CoreOS 411.86.202211232221-0 (Ootpa)   4.18.0-372.32.1.el8_6.x86_64   cri-o://1.24.3-6.rhaos4.11.gitc4567c0.el8
huirwang-1128a-s6j6t-master-2          Ready    master   153m   v1.24.6+5658434   10.0.0.6      <none>        Red Hat Enterprise Linux CoreOS 411.86.202211232221-0 (Ootpa)   4.18.0-372.32.1.el8_6.x86_64   cri-o://1.24.3-6.rhaos4.11.gitc4567c0.el8
huirwang-1128a-s6j6t-worker-westus-1   Ready    worker   135m   v1.24.6+5658434   10.0.1.5      <none>        Red Hat Enterprise Linux CoreOS 411.86.202211232221-0 (Ootpa)   4.18.0-372.32.1.el8_6.x86_64   cri-o://1.24.3-6.rhaos4.11.gitc4567c0.el8
huirwang-1128a-s6j6t-worker-westus-2   Ready    worker   136m   v1.24.6+5658434   10.0.1.4      <none>        Red Hat Enterprise Linux CoreOS 411.86.202211232221-0 (Ootpa)   4.18.0-372.32.1.el8_6.x86_64   cri-o://1.24.3-6.rhaos4.11.gitc4567c0.el8

 % oc get node huirwang-1128a-s6j6t-worker-westus-1 --show-labels
NAME                                   STATUS   ROLES    AGE    VERSION           LABELS
huirwang-1128a-s6j6t-worker-westus-1   Ready    worker   136m   v1.24.6+5658434   beta.kubernetes.io/arch=amd64,beta.kubernetes.io/instance-type=Standard_D4s_v3,beta.kubernetes.io/os=linux,failure-domain.beta.kubernetes.io/region=westus,failure-domain.beta.kubernetes.io/zone=0,k8s.ovn.org/egress-assignable=true,kubernetes.io/arch=amd64,kubernetes.io/hostname=huirwang-1128a-s6j6t-worker-westus-1,kubernetes.io/os=linux,node-role.kubernetes.io/worker=,node.kubernetes.io/instance-type=Standard_D4s_v3,node.openshift.io/os_id=rhcos,topology.disk.csi.azure.com/zone=,topology.kubernetes.io/region=westus,topology.kubernetes.io/zone=0

 % oc get node huirwang-1128a-s6j6t-worker-westus-2 --show-labels
NAME                                   STATUS   ROLES    AGE    VERSION           LABELS
huirwang-1128a-s6j6t-worker-westus-2   Ready    worker   136m   v1.24.6+5658434   beta.kubernetes.io/arch=amd64,beta.kubernetes.io/instance-type=Standard_D4s_v3,beta.kubernetes.io/os=linux,failure-domain.beta.kubernetes.io/region=westus,failure-domain.beta.kubernetes.io/zone=0,k8s.ovn.org/egress-assignable=true,kubernetes.io/arch=amd64,kubernetes.io/hostname=huirwang-1128a-s6j6t-worker-westus-2,kubernetes.io/os=linux,node-role.kubernetes.io/worker=,node.kubernetes.io/instance-type=Standard_D4s_v3,node.openshift.io/os_id=rhcos,topology.disk.csi.azure.com/zone=,topology.kubernetes.io/region=westus,topology.kubernetes.io/zone=0
2. Created two egressIP objects
3.

Actual results:

egressip-47032 was not applied to any egress node
% oc get egressip
NAME             EGRESSIPS    ASSIGNED NODE                          ASSIGNED EGRESSIPS
egressip-47032   10.0.1.166                                          
egressip-47034   10.0.1.181   huirwang-1128a-s6j6t-worker-westus-1   10.0.1.181

%  oc get cloudprivateipconfig                      
NAME         AGE
10.0.1.130   6m25s
10.0.1.138   6m34s
10.0.1.166   6m34s
10.0.1.181   6m25s
%  oc get cloudprivateipconfig  10.0.1.166  -o yaml
apiVersion: cloud.network.openshift.io/v1
kind: CloudPrivateIPConfig
metadata:
  annotations:
    k8s.ovn.org/egressip-owner-ref: egressip-47032
  creationTimestamp: "2022-11-28T10:27:37Z"
  finalizers:
  - cloudprivateipconfig.cloud.network.openshift.io/finalizer
  generation: 1
  name: 10.0.1.166
  resourceVersion: "87528"
  uid: 5221075a-35d0-4670-a6a7-ddfc6cbc700b
spec:
  node: huirwang-1128a-s6j6t-worker-westus-1
status:
  conditions:
  - lastTransitionTime: "2022-11-28T10:33:29Z"
    message: 'Error processing cloud assignment request, err: <nil>'
    observedGeneration: 1
    reason: CloudResponseError
    status: "False"
    type: Assigned
  node: huirwang-1128a-s6j6t-worker-westus-1
%  oc get cloudprivateipconfig  10.0.1.138  -o yaml 
apiVersion: cloud.network.openshift.io/v1
kind: CloudPrivateIPConfig
metadata:
  annotations:
    k8s.ovn.org/egressip-owner-ref: egressip-47032
  creationTimestamp: "2022-11-28T10:27:37Z"
  finalizers:
  - cloudprivateipconfig.cloud.network.openshift.io/finalizer
  generation: 1
  name: 10.0.1.138
  resourceVersion: "87523"
  uid: e4604e76-64d8-4735-87a2-eb50d28854cc
spec:
  node: huirwang-1128a-s6j6t-worker-westus-2
status:
  conditions:
  - lastTransitionTime: "2022-11-28T10:33:29Z"
    message: 'Error processing cloud assignment request, err: <nil>'
    observedGeneration: 1
    reason: CloudResponseError
    status: "False"
    type: Assigned
  node: huirwang-1128a-s6j6t-worker-westus-2

oc logs cloud-network-config-controller-6f7b994ddc-vhtbp  -n openshift-cloud-network-config-controller

.......
E1128 10:30:43.590807       1 controller.go:165] error syncing '10.0.1.138': error assigning CloudPrivateIPConfig: "10.0.1.138" to node: "huirwang-1128a-s6j6t-worker-westus-2", err: network.InterfacesClient#CreateOrUpdate: Failure sending request: StatusCode=0 -- Original Error: Code="InvalidRequestFormat" Message="Cannot parse the request." Details=[{"code":"DuplicateResourceName","message":"Resource /subscriptions//resourceGroups//providers/Microsoft.Network/networkInterfaces/ has two child resources with the same name (huirwang-1128a-s6j6t-worker-westus-2_10.0.1.138)."}], requeuing in cloud-private-ip-config workqueue
I1128 10:30:44.051422       1 cloudprivateipconfig_controller.go:271] CloudPrivateIPConfig: "10.0.1.166" will be added to node: "huirwang-1128a-s6j6t-worker-westus-1"
E1128 10:30:44.301259       1 controller.go:165] error syncing '10.0.1.166': error assigning CloudPrivateIPConfig: "10.0.1.166" to node: "huirwang-1128a-s6j6t-worker-westus-1", err: network.InterfacesClient#CreateOrUpdate: Failure sending request: StatusCode=0 -- Original Error: Code="InvalidRequestFormat" Message="Cannot parse the request." Details=[{"code":"DuplicateResourceName","message":"Resource /subscriptions//resourceGroups//providers/Microsoft.Network/networkInterfaces/ has two child resources with the same name (huirwang-1128a-s6j6t-worker-westus-1_10.0.1.166)."}], requeuing in cloud-private-ip-config workqueue
..........

Expected results:

EgressIP can be applied successfully.

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/cloud-network-config-controller/pull/79
• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1404

• https://github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/pull/3307

Since 4.11 OCP comes with OperatorHub definition which declares a capability
and enables all catalog sources. For OKD we want to enable just community-operators
as users may not have Red Hat pull secret set.
This commit would ensure that OKD version of marketplace operator gets
its own OperatorHub manifest with a custom set of operator catalogs enabled

• https://github.com/operator-framework/operator-marketplace/pull/485

Description of problem:

This is just a clone of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105570 for purposes of cherry-picking.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.13

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/6685

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2438. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

On the alert details page and alerting rule details page, clicking on a field that has a popover help throws an uncaught JavaScript error.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Go to Observe > Alerting pages
2. Click on an alert (or go to the rules tab then click on a rule)
3. Click on one of the underlined fields (those that have a popover help)

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12173

Description of problem:

The ovn-kubernetes ovnkube-master containers are continuously crashlooping since we updated to 4.11.0-0.okd-2022-10-15-073651.

Log Excerpt:

] [] []  [{kubectl-client-side-apply Update networking.k8s.io/v1 2022-09-12 12:25:06 +0000 UTC FieldsV1 {"f:metadata":{"f:annotations":{".":{},"f:kubectl.kubernetes.io/last-applied-configuration":{}}},"f:spec":{"f:ingress":{},"f:policyTypes":{}}} }]},Spec:NetworkPolicySpec{PodSelector:{map[] []},Ingress:[]NetworkPolicyIngressRule{NetworkPolicyIngressRule{Ports:[]NetworkPolicyPort{},From:[]NetworkPolicyPeer{NetworkPolicyPeer{PodSelector:&v1.LabelSelector{MatchLabels:map[string]string{access: true,},MatchExpressions:[]LabelSelectorRequirement{},},NamespaceSelector:nil,IPBlock:nil,},},},},Egress:[]NetworkPolicyEgressRule{},PolicyTypes:[Ingress],},} &NetworkPolicy{ObjectMeta:{allow-from-openshift-ingress  compsci-gradcentral  a405f843-c250-40d7-8dd4-a759f764f091 217304038 1 2022-09-22 14:36:38 +0000 UTC <nil> <nil> map[] map[] [] []  [{openshift-apiserver Update networking.k8s.io/v1 2022-09-22 14:36:38 +0000 UTC FieldsV1 {"f:spec":{"f:ingress":{},"f:policyTypes":{}}} }]},Spec:NetworkPolicySpec{PodSelector:{map[] []},Ingress:[]NetworkPolicyIngressRule{NetworkPolicyIngressRule{Ports:[]NetworkPolicyPort{},From:[]NetworkPolicyPeer{NetworkPolicyPeer{PodSelector:nil,NamespaceSelector:&v1.LabelSelector{MatchLabels:map[string]string{policy-group.network.openshift.io/ingress: ,},MatchExpressions:[]LabelSelectorRequirement{},},IPBlock:nil,},},},},Egress:[]NetworkPolicyEgressRule{},PolicyTypes:[Ingress],},}]: cannot clean up egress default deny ACL name: error in transact with ops [{Op:mutate Table:Port_Group Row:map[] Rows:[] Columns:[] Mutations:[{Column:acls Mutator:delete Value:{GoSet:[{GoUUID:60cb946a-46e9-4623-9ba4-3cb35f018ed6}]}}] Timeout:<nil> Where:[where column _uuid == {ccdd01bf-3009-42fb-9672-e1df38190cd7}] Until: Durable:<nil> Comment:<nil> Lock:<nil> UUIDName:} {Op:mutate Table:Port_Group Row:map[] Rows:[] Columns:[] Mutations:[{Column:acls Mutator:delete Value:{GoSet:[{GoUUID:60cb946a-46e9-4623-9ba4-3cb35f018ed6}]}}] Timeout:<nil> Where:[where column _uuid == {10bbf229-8c1b-4c62-b36e-4ba0097722db}] Until: Durable:<nil> Comment:<nil> Lock:<nil> UUIDName:} {Op:delete Table:ACL Row:map[] Rows:[] Columns:[] Mutations:[] Timeout:<nil> Where:[where column _uuid == {7b55ba0c-150f-4a63-9601-cfde25f29408}] Until: Durable:<nil> Comment:<nil> Lock:<nil> UUIDName:} {Op:delete Table:ACL Row:map[] Rows:[] Columns:[] Mutations:[] Timeout:<nil> Where:[where column _uuid == {60cb946a-46e9-4623-9ba4-3cb35f018ed6}] Until: Durable:<nil> Comment:<nil> Lock:<nil> UUIDName:}] results [{Count:1 Error: Details: UUID:{GoUUID:} Rows:[]} {Count:1 Error: Details: UUID:{GoUUID:} Rows:[]} {Count:1 Error: Details: UUID:{GoUUID:} Rows:[]} {Count:1 Error: Details: UUID:{GoUUID:} Rows:[]} {Count:0 Error:referential integrity violation Details:cannot delete ACL row 7b55ba0c-150f-4a63-9601-cfde25f29408 because of 1 remaining reference(s) UUID:{GoUUID:} Rows:[]}] and errors []: referential integrity violation: cannot delete ACL row 7b55ba0c-150f-4a63-9601-cfde25f29408 because of 1 remaining reference(s)

Additional info:

https://github.com/okd-project/okd/issues/1372

Issue persisted through update to 4.11.0-0.okd-2022-10-28-153352

must-gather: https://nbc9-snips.cloud.duke.edu/snips/must-gather.local.2859117512952590880.zip

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1444

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-6850. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-6503. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

While looking into OCPBUGS-5505 I discovered that some 4.10->4.11 upgrade job runs perform an Admin Ack check, while some do not. 4.11 has a ack-4.11-kube-1.25-api-removals-in-4.12 gate, so these upgrade jobs sometimes test that Upgradeable goes false after the ugprade, and sometimes they do not. This is only determined by the polling race condition: the check is executed once per 10 minutes, and we cancel the polling after upgrade is completed. This means that in some cases we are lucky and manage to run one check before the cancel, and sometimes we are not and only check while still on the base version.

Example job that checked admin acks post-upgrade:
https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/openshift-cluster-version-operator-880-ci-4.11-upgrade-from-stable-4.10-e2e-azure-upgrade/1611444032104304640

$ curl --silent https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/origin-ci-test/logs/openshift-cluster-version-operator-880-ci-4.11-upgrade-from-stable-4.10-e2e-azure-upgrade/1611444032104304640/artifacts/e2e-azure-upgrade/openshift-e2e-test/artifacts/e2e.log | grep 'Waiting for Upgradeable to be AdminAckRequired'
Jan  6 21:16:40.153: INFO: Waiting for Upgradeable to be AdminAckRequired ...

Example job that did not check admin acks post-upgrade:
https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/openshift-cluster-version-operator-880-ci-4.11-upgrade-from-stable-4.10-e2e-azure-upgrade/1611444033509396480

$ curl --silent https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/origin-ci-test/logs/openshift-cluster-version-operator-880-ci-4.11-upgrade-from-stable-4.10-e2e-azure-upgrade/1611444033509396480/artifacts/e2e-azure-upgrade/openshift-e2e-test/artifacts/e2e.log | grep 'Waiting for Upgradeable to be AdminAckRequired'

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11+ openshift-tests

How reproducible:

nondeterministic, wild guess is ~30% of upgrade jobs

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Inspect the E2E test log of an upgrade jobs and compare the time of the update ("Completed upgrade") with the time of the last check ( "Skipping admin ack", "Gate .* not applicable to current version", "Admin Ack verified') done by the admin ack test

Actual results:

Jan 23 00:47:43.842: INFO: Admin Ack verified
Jan 23 00:57:43.836: INFO: Admin Ack verified
Jan 23 01:07:43.839: INFO: Admin Ack verified
Jan 23 01:17:33.474: INFO: Completed upgrade to registry.build01.ci.openshift.org/ci-op-z09ll8fw/release@sha256:322cf67dc00dd6fa4fdd25c3530e4e75800f6306bd86c4ad1418c92770d58ab8

No check done after the upgrade

Expected results:

Jan 23 00:57:37.894: INFO: Admin Ack verified
Jan 23 01:07:37.894: INFO: Admin Ack verified
Jan 23 01:16:43.618: INFO: Completed upgrade to registry.build01.ci.openshift.org/ci-op-z8h5x1c5/release@sha256:9c4c732a0b4c2ae887c73b35685e52146518e5d2b06726465d99e6a83ccfee8d
Jan 23 01:17:57.937: INFO: Admin Ack verified

One or more checks done after upgrade

• https://github.com/openshift/origin/pull/27685

This bug is a backport clone of [Bugzilla Bug 2118318](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118318). The following is the description of the original bug:
—
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #2117569 +++

Description of problem:

The _{garbage collector} resource quota controller must ignore ALL events; otherwise, if a rogue controller or a workload causes unbound event creation, performance will degrade as it has to process the events.

Fix: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/110939

This bug is to track fix in master (4.12) and also allow to backport to 4.11.1

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

— Additional comment from Michal Fojtik on 2022-08-11 10:52:28 UTC —

I'm using FastFix here as we need to backport this to 4.11.1 to avoid support churn for busy clusters or clusters doing upgrades.

— Additional comment from ART BZ Bot on 2022-08-11 15:13:32 UTC —

Elliott changed bug status from MODIFIED to ON_QA.
This bug is expected to ship in the next 4.12 release.

— Additional comment from zhou ying on 2022-08-12 03:03:34 UTC —

checked the payload commit id , the payload 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-08-11-191750 has container the fixed pr .

oc adm release info registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release:4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-08-11-191750 --commit-urls |grep hyperkube
Warning: the default reading order of registry auth file will be changed from "${HOME}/.docker/config.json" to podman registry config locations in the future version. "${HOME}/.docker/config.json" is deprecated, but can still be used for storing credentials as a fallback. See https://github.com/containers/image/blob/main/docs/containers-auth.json.5.md for the order of podman registry config locations.
hyperkube https://github.com/openshift/kubernetes/commit/da80cd038ee5c3b45ba36d4b48b42eb8a74439a3

commit da80cd038ee5c3b45ba36d4b48b42eb8a74439a3 (HEAD -> master, origin/release-4.13, origin/release-4.12, origin/master, origin/HEAD)
Merge: a9d6306a701 055b96e614a
Author: OpenShift Merge Robot <openshift-merge-robot@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Thu Aug 11 15:13:05 2022 +0000

Merge pull request #1338 from benluddy/openshift-pick-110888

Bug 2117569: UPSTREAM: 110888: feat: fix a bug thaat not all event be ignored by gc controller

• https://github.com/openshift/kubernetes/pull/1379

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3265. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3172. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Customer is trying to install the Logging operator, which appears to attempt to install a dynamic plugin. The operator installation fails in the console because permissions aren't available to "patch resource consoles".

We shouldn't block operator installation if permission issues prevent dynamic plugin installation.

This is an OSD cluster, presumably for a customer with "cluster-admin", although it may be a paired down permission set called "dedicated-admin".

See https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hYS-bm6aH7S6z7We76dn9XOFcpi9CGYcGoJys514YSY/edit for permissions investigation work on OSD

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12240

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-683. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:

{See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118563#c5,
The following messages here are "normal" on startup, but it is very misleading with error statement, suggest suppress them or update them to some more clear context that we can know they are in normal process.

E0818 02:18:53.709223       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:53.715530       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:53.735885       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:53.775984       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:53.790449       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:53.856911       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:53.950782       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:54.017583       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:54.271967       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:54.338944       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:54.916988       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:54.982211       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue}

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/cloud-network-config-controller/pull/85

Description of problem:
Switching the spec.endpointPublishingStrategy.loadBalancer.scope of the default ingresscontroller results in a degraded ingress operator. The routes using that endpoint like the console URL become inaccessible.
Degraded operators after scope change:

$ oc get co | grep -v ' True        False         False'
NAME                                       VERSION   AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   DEGRADED   SINCE   MESSAGE
authentication                             4.11.4    False       False         True       72m     OAuthServerRouteEndpointAccessibleControllerAvailable: Get "https://oauth-openshift.apps.kartrosa.ukld.s1.devshift.org/healthz": EOF
console                                    4.11.4    False       False         False      72m     RouteHealthAvailable: failed to GET route (https://console-openshift-console.apps.kartrosa.ukld.s1.devshift.org): Get "https://console-openshift-console.apps.kartrosa.ukld.s1.devshift.org": EOF
ingress                                    4.11.4    True        False         True       65m     The "default" ingress controller reports Degraded=True: DegradedConditions: One or more other status conditions indicate a degraded state: CanaryChecksSucceeding=False (CanaryChecksRepetitiveFailures: Canary route checks for the default ingress controller are failing)

We have noticed that each time this happens the underlying AWS loadbalancer gets recreated which is as expected however the router pods probably do not get notified about the new loadbalancer. The instances in the new loadbalancer become 'outOfService'.

Restarting one of the router pods fixes the issue and brings back a couple of instances under the loadbalancer back to 'InService' which leads to the operators becoming happy again.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

ingress in 4.11.z however we suspect this issue to also apply to older versions

How reproducible:

Consistently reproducible

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create a test OCP 4.11 cluster in AWS
2. Switch the spec.endpointPublishingStrategy.loadBalancer.scope of the default ingresscontroller in openshift-ingress-operator to Internal from External (or vice versa)
3. New Loadbalancer is created in AWS for the default router service, however the instances behind are not in service

Actual results:

ingress, authentication and console operators go into a degraded state. Console URL of the cluster is inaccessible

Expected results:

The ingresscontroller scope transition from internal->External (or vice versa) is smooth without any downtime or operators going into degraded state. The console is accessible.

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1389

This bug is a backport clone of [Bugzilla Bug 2034883](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034883). The following is the description of the original bug:
—
Description of problem:

Situation (starting point):

• There is an ongoing change to the machine-config-daemon daemonset being applied by the machine-config-operator pod. It is waiting for the daemonset to roll out.
• There are some nodes not ready, so daemonset rollout never ends and waiting on that ends in timeout error.

Problem:

• Machine-config-operator pods stops trying to reconcile stuff whenever it finds timeout error in waiting for the machine-config-daemon rollout
• This implies that the `spec.kubeAPIServerServingCAData` field of controllerconfig/machine-config-controller object is not updated when the kube-apiserver-operator updates kube-apiserver-to-kubelet-client-ca configmap.
• Without that field updated, a kube-apiserver-to-kubelet-client-ca change is never rolled out to the nodes.
• That ultimately leads to cluster-wide unavailability of "oc logs", "oc rsh" etc. commands when the kube-apiserver-operator starts using a client cert signed by the new kube-apiserver-to-kubelet-client-ca to access kubelet ports.

Version-Release number of MCO (Machine Config Operator) (if applicable):

4.7.21

Platform (AWS, VSphere, Metal, etc.): (not relevant)

Are you certain that the root cause of the issue being reported is the MCO (Machine Config Operator)?
(Y/N/Not sure): Y

How reproducible:

Always if the said conditions are met.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Have some nodes not ready
2. Force a change that requires machine-config-daemon daemonset rollout (I think that changing proxy settings would work for this)
3. Wait until a new kube-apiserver-to-kubelet-client-ca is rolled out by kube-apiserver-operator

Actual results:

New kube-apiserver-to-kubelet-client-ca not forwarded to controllerconfig, kube-apiserver-to-kubelet-client-ca not deployed on nodes

Expected results:

kube-apiserver-to-kubelet-client-ca forwarded to controllerconfig, kube-apiserver-to-kubelet-client-ca deployed to nodes.

Additional info:

In comments

• https://github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/pull/3421

This is a clone of OCPBUGSM-47085
Version:

$ openshift-install version
4.11.0-rc2

Platform:

Nutanix

On `openshift-installer create manifests` stage a connection to Prism is made (see https://github.com/openshift/installer/blob/master/pkg/asset/installconfig/nutanix/validation.go#L15-L36=)

This make generating manifests separately impossible, which breaks Assisted Installer flow. Instead of storing sensitive user information, Assisted Installer sets fake details in install-config.yaml and asks user to update these after installation has completed.

With validation happening on `openshift-install create manifests` phase installation process can't start with invalid credentials.

Please move this validation to ValidateForProvisioning, similar to vSphere

• https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/6251

Description of problem:

When queried dns hostname from certain pod on the certain node, responded from random coredns pod, not prefer local one. Is it expected result ?

# In OCP v4.8.13 case
// Ran dig command on the certain node which is running the following test-7cc4488d48-tqc4m pod.
sh-4.4# while : ; do echo -n "$(date '+%H:%M:%S') :"; dig google.com +short; sleep 1; done
:
07:16:33 :172.217.175.238
07:16:34 :172.217.175.238 <--- Refreshed the upstream result
07:16:36 :142.250.207.46
07:16:37 :142.250.207.46

// The dig results is matched with the running node one as you can see the above one.
$ oc rsh  test-7cc4488d48-tqc4m bash -c 'while : ; do echo -n "$(date '+%H:%M:%S') :"; dig google.com +short; sleep 1; done'
:
07:16:35 :172.217.175.238 
07:16:36 :172.217.175.238 <--- At the same time, the pod dig result is also refreshed.
07:16:37 :142.250.207.46
07:16:38 :142.250.207.46


But in v4.10 case, in contrast, the dns query result is various and responded randomly regardless local dns results on the node as follows.

# In OCP v4.10.23 case, pod's response from DNS services are not consistent.
$ oc rsh test-848fcf8ddb-zrcbx  bash -c 'while : ; do echo -n "$(date '+%H:%M:%S') :"; dig google.com +short; sleep 1; done'
07:23:00 :142.250.199.110
07:23:01 :142.250.207.46
07:23:02 :142.250.207.46
07:23:03 :142.250.199.110
07:23:04 :142.250.199.110
07:23:05 :172.217.161.78

# Even though the node which is running the pod keep responding the same IP...
sh-4.4# while : ; do echo -n "$(date '+%H:%M:%S') :"; dig google.com +short; sleep 1; done
07:23:00 :172.217.161.78
07:23:01 :172.217.161.78
07:23:02 :172.217.161.78
07:23:03 :172.217.161.78
07:23:04 :172.217.161.78
07:23:05 :172.217.161.78

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

v4.10.23 (ROSA)
SDN: OpenShiftSDN

How reproducible:

You can always reproduce this issue using "dig google.com" from both any pod and the node the pod running according to the above "Description" details.

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Run any usual pod, and check which node the pod is running on.
2. Run dig google.com on the pod and the node.
3. Check the IP is consistent with the running node each other. 

Actual results:

The response IPs are not consistent and random IP is responded.

Expected results:

The response IP is kind of consistent, and aware of prefer local dns.

Additional info:

This issue affects EgressNetworkPolicy dnsName feature.

• https://github.com/openshift/sdn/pull/466
• https://github.com/openshift/sdn/pull/456

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4696. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

metal3 pod does not come up on SNO when creating Provisioning with provisioningNetwork set to Disabled

The issue is that on SNO, there is no Machine, and no BareMetalHost, it is looking of Machine objects to populate the provisioningMacAddresses field. However, when provisioningNetwork is Disabled, provisioningMacAddresses is not used anyway.

You can work around this issue by populating provisioningMacAddresses with a dummy address, like this:

kind: Provisioning
metadata:
  name: provisioning-configuration
spec:
  provisioningMacAddresses:
  - aa:aa:aa:aa:aa:aa
  provisioningNetwork: Disabled
  watchAllNamespaces: true

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11.17

How reproducible:

Try to bring up Provisioning on SNO in 4.11.17 with provisioningNetwork set to Disabled

apiVersion: metal3.io/v1alpha1
kind: Provisioning
metadata:
  name: provisioning-configuration
spec:
  provisioningNetwork: Disabled
  watchAllNamespaces: true

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

controller/provisioning "msg"="Reconciler error" "error"="machines with cluster-api-machine-role=master not found" "name"="provisioning-configuration" "namespace"="" "reconciler group"="metal3.io" "reconciler kind"="Provisioning"

Expected results:

metal3 pod should be deployed

Additional info:

This issue is a result of this change: https://github.com/openshift/cluster-baremetal-operator/pull/307
See this Slack thread: https://coreos.slack.com/archives/CFP6ST0A3/p1670530729168599

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-baremetal-operator/pull/318

Description of problem:

In order to understand what is going on with OCPBUGS-5379 we want to add more logs

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/pull/3497

Backport to 4.11.z

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-storage-operator/pull/313

Description of problem:

AWS tagging - when applying user defined tags you cannot add more than 10

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/6303

• https://github.com/openshift/image-registry/pull/343

Description of problem:

During an upgrade from 4.10.0-0.nightly-2022-09-06-081345 -> 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-06-074353

DNS operator stuck in progressing state with following error in dns-defalt pod

2022-09-07T00:47:35.959931289Z [WARNING] plugin/kubernetes: Kubernetes API connection failure: Get "https://172.30.0.1:443/version": dial tcp 172.30.0.1:443: i/o timeout

must-gather: http://shell.lab.bos.redhat.com/~anusaxen/must-gather-136172-050448657.tar.gz

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-06-074353

How reproducible:

Intermittent

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Perform upgrade from 4.10->4.11
2.
3.

Actual results:

Upgrade unsuccessful due to API svc unreachability

Expected results:

Upgrade should be successful

Additional info:

$ omg get co | grep -v "True.*False.*False"
NAME                                      VERSION                             AVAILABLE  PROGRESSING  DEGRADED  SINCE
dns                                       4.10.0-0.nightly-2022-09-06-081345  True       True         False     3h4m
network                                   4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-06-074353  True       True         False     3h5m

$ omg logs dns-default-5mqz4 -c dns -n openshift-dns
/home/anusaxen/Downloads/must-gather-136208-318613238/must-gather.local.4033693973186012455/quay-io-openshift-release-dev-ocp-v4-0-art-dev-sha256-d995e1608ba83a1f71b5a1c49705aa3cef38618e0674ee256332d1b0e2cb0e23/namespaces/openshift-dns/pods/dns-default-5mqz4/dns/dns/logs/current.log
2022-09-07T00:45:36.355161941Z [INFO] plugin/kubernetes: waiting for Kubernetes API before starting server
2022-09-07T00:45:36.854403897Z [INFO] plugin/kubernetes: waiting for Kubernetes API before starting server
2022-09-07T00:45:37.354367197Z [INFO] plugin/kubernetes: waiting for Kubernetes API before starting server
2022-09-07T00:45:37.861427861Z [INFO] plugin/kubernetes: waiting for Kubernetes API before starting server
2022-09-07T00:45:38.355095996Z [INFO] plugin/kubernetes: waiting for Kubernetes API before starting server
2022-09-07T00:45:38.855063626Z [INFO] plugin/kubernetes: waiting for Kubernetes API before starting server
2022-09-07T00:45:39.355170472Z [INFO] plugin/kubernetes: waiting for Kubernetes API before starting server
2022-09-07T00:45:39.855296624Z [INFO] plugin/kubernetes: waiting for Kubernetes API before starting server
2022-09-07T00:45:40.355481413Z [INFO] plugin/kubernetes: waiting for Kubernetes API before starting server
2022-09-07T00:45:40.855455283Z [WARNING] plugin/kubernetes: starting server with unsynced Kubernetes API
2022-09-07T00:45:40.856166731Z .:5353
2022-09-07T00:45:40.856166731Z [INFO] plugin/reload: Running configuration SHA512 = 7c3db3182389e270fe3af971fef9e7157a34bde01eb750d58c2d4895a965ecb2e2d00df34594b6a819653088b6efa2590e748ce23f9e16cbb0f44d74a4fc3587
2022-09-07T00:45:40.856166731Z CoreDNS-1.9.2
2022-09-07T00:45:40.856166731Z linux/amd64, go1.18.4, 
2022-09-07T00:46:05.957503195Z [WARNING] plugin/kubernetes: Kubernetes API connection failure: Get "https://172.30.0.1:443/version": dial tcp 172.30.0.1:443: i/o timeout
2022-09-07T00:47:25.444876534Z [INFO] SIGTERM: Shutting down servers then terminating
2022-09-07T00:47:25.444984367Z [INFO] plugin/health: Going into lameduck mode for 20s
2022-09-07T00:47:35.959931289Z [WARNING] plugin/kubernetes: Kubernetes API connection failure: Get "https://172.30.0.1:443/version": dial tcp 172.30.0.1:443: i/o timeout

• https://github.com/openshift/sdn/pull/488

This was originally reported in BZ as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046335

—

Description of problem:

The issue reported here https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1954121 still occur (tested on OCP 4.8.11, the CU also verified that the issue can happen even with OpenShift 4.7.30, 4.8.17 and 4.9.11)

How reproducible:

Attach a NIC to a master node will trigger the issue

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Deploy an OCP cluster (I've tested it IPI on AWS)
2. Attach a second NIC to a running master node (in my case "ip-10-0-178-163.eu-central-1.compute.internal")

Actual results:

~~~
$ oc get node ip-10-0-178-163.eu-central-1.compute.internal -o json | jq ".status.addresses"
[

,

,

,

]

$ oc get co etcd
NAME VERSION AVAILABLE PROGRESSING DEGRADED SINCE
etcd 4.8.11 True False True 31h

$ oc get co etcd -o json | jq ".status.conditions[0]"

~~~

Expected results:

To have the certificate valid also for the second IP (the newly created one "10.0.187.247")

Additional info:

Deleting the following secrets seems to solve the issue:
~~~
$ oc get secret n openshift-etcd | grep kubernetes.io/tls | grep ^etcd
etcd-client kubernetes.io/tls 2 61s
etcd-peer-ip-10-0-132-49.eu-central-1.compute.internal kubernetes.io/tls 2 61s
etcd-peer-ip-10-0-178-163.eu-central-1.compute.internal kubernetes.io/tls 2 61s
etcd-peer-ip-10-0-202-187.eu-central-1.compute.internal kubernetes.io/tls 2 60s
etcd-serving-ip-10-0-132-49.eu-central-1.compute.internal kubernetes.io/tls 2 60s
etcd-serving-ip-10-0-178-163.eu-central-1.compute.internal kubernetes.io/tls 2 59s
etcd-serving-ip-10-0-202-187.eu-central-1.compute.internal kubernetes.io/tls 2 59s
etcd-serving-metrics-ip-10-0-132-49.eu-central-1.compute.internal kubernetes.io/tls 2 58s
etcd-serving-metrics-ip-10-0-178-163.eu-central-1.compute.internal kubernetes.io/tls 2 59s
etcd-serving-metrics-ip-10-0-202-187.eu-central-1.compute.internal kubernetes.io/tls 2 58s

$ oc get secret n openshift-etcd | grep kubernetes.io/tls | grep ^etcd | awk '

' | xargs -I {} oc delete secret {} -n openshift-etcd
secret "etcd-client" deleted
secret "etcd-peer-ip-10-0-132-49.eu-central-1.compute.internal" deleted
secret "etcd-peer-ip-10-0-178-163.eu-central-1.compute.internal" deleted
secret "etcd-peer-ip-10-0-202-187.eu-central-1.compute.internal" deleted
secret "etcd-serving-ip-10-0-132-49.eu-central-1.compute.internal" deleted
secret "etcd-serving-ip-10-0-178-163.eu-central-1.compute.internal" deleted
secret "etcd-serving-ip-10-0-202-187.eu-central-1.compute.internal" deleted
secret "etcd-serving-metrics-ip-10-0-132-49.eu-central-1.compute.internal" deleted
secret "etcd-serving-metrics-ip-10-0-178-163.eu-central-1.compute.internal" deleted
secret "etcd-serving-metrics-ip-10-0-202-187.eu-central-1.compute.internal" deleted

$ oc get co etcd -o json | jq ".status.conditions[0]"

~~~

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pull/931

OCPBUGS-1251 landed an admin-ack gate in 4.11.z to help admins prepare for Kubernetes 1.25 API removals which are coming in OpenShift 4.12. Poking around in a 4.12.0-ec.2 cluster where APIRemovedInNextReleaseInUse is firing:

$ oc --as system:admin adm must-gather -- /usr/bin/gather_audit_logs
$ zgrep -h v1beta1/poddisruptionbudget must-gather.local.1378724704026451055/quay*/audit_logs/kube-apiserver/*.log.gz | jq -r '.verb + " " + (.user | .username + " " + (.extra["authentication.kubernetes.io/pod-name"] | tostr
ing))' | sort | uniq -c
parse error: Invalid numeric literal at line 29, column 6
     28 watch system:serviceaccount:openshift-machine-api:cluster-autoscaler ["cluster-autoscaler-default-5cf997b8d6-ptgg7"]

Finding the source for that container:

$ oc --as system:admin -n openshift-machine-api get -o json pod cluster-autoscaler-default-5cf997b8d6-ptgg7 | jq -r '.status.containerStatuses[].image'
quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:f81ab7ce0c851ba5e5169bba717cb54716ce5457cbe89d159c97a5c25fd820ed
$ oc image info quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:f81ab7ce0c851ba5e5169bba717cb54716ce5457cbe89d159c97a5c25fd820ed | grep github
             SOURCE_GIT_URL=https://github.com/openshift/kubernetes-autoscaler
             io.openshift.build.commit.url=https://github.com/openshift/kubernetes-autoscaler/commit/1dac0311b9842958ec630273428b74703d51c1c9
             io.openshift.build.source-location=https://github.com/openshift/kubernetes-autoscaler

Poking about in the source:

$ git clone --depth 30 --branch master https://github.com/openshift/kubernetes-autoscaler.git
$ cd kubernetes-autoscaler
$ find . -name vendor
./addon-resizer/vendor
./cluster-autoscaler/vendor
./vertical-pod-autoscaler/e2e/vendor
./vertical-pod-autoscaler/vendor

Lots of vendoring. I haven't checked to see how new the client code is in the various vendor packages. But the main issue seems to be the v1beta1 in:

$ git grep policy cluster-autoscaler/core cluster-autoscaler/utils | grep policy.*v1beta1
cluster-autoscaler/core/scaledown/actuation/actuator_test.go:   policyv1beta1 "k8s.io/api/policy/v1beta1"
cluster-autoscaler/core/scaledown/actuation/actuator_test.go:                                   eviction := createAction.GetObject().(*policyv1beta1.Eviction)
cluster-autoscaler/core/scaledown/actuation/drain.go:   policyv1 "k8s.io/api/policy/v1beta1"
cluster-autoscaler/core/scaledown/actuation/drain_test.go:      policyv1 "k8s.io/api/policy/v1beta1"
cluster-autoscaler/core/scaledown/legacy/legacy.go:     policyv1 "k8s.io/api/policy/v1beta1"
cluster-autoscaler/core/scaledown/legacy/wrapper.go:    policyv1 "k8s.io/api/policy/v1beta1"
cluster-autoscaler/core/scaledown/scaledown.go: policyv1 "k8s.io/api/policy/v1beta1"
cluster-autoscaler/core/static_autoscaler_test.go:      policyv1 "k8s.io/api/policy/v1beta1"
cluster-autoscaler/utils/drain/drain.go:        policyv1 "k8s.io/api/policy/v1beta1"
cluster-autoscaler/utils/drain/drain_test.go:   policyv1 "k8s.io/api/policy/v1beta1"
cluster-autoscaler/utils/kubernetes/listers.go: policyv1 "k8s.io/api/policy/v1beta1"
cluster-autoscaler/utils/kubernetes/listers.go: v1policylister "k8s.io/client-go/listers/policy/v1beta1"

The main change from v1beta1 to v1 involves spec.selector; I dunno if that's relevant to the autoscaler use-case or not.

Do we run autoscaler CI? I was poking around a bit, but did not find a 4.12 periodic excercising the autoscaler that might have turned up this alert and issue.

• https://github.com/openshift/kubernetes-autoscaler/pull/244

libovsdb builds transaction log messages for every transaction and then throws them away if the log level is not 4 or above. This wastes a bunch of CPU at scale and increases pod ready latency.

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1374

OVS 2.17+ introduced an optimization of "weak references" to substantially speed up database snapshots. in some cases weak references may leak memory; to aforementioned commit fixes that and has been pulled into ovs2.17-62 and later.

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1438

Description of problem:

When adding new nodes to the existing cluster, the newly allocated node-subnet can be overlapped with the existing node.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

openshift 4.10.30

How reproducible:

It's quite hard to reproduce but  there is a possibility it can happen any time. 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create a OVN dual-stack cluster
2. add nodes to the existing cluster
3. check the allocated node subnet 

Actual results:

Some newly added nodes have the same node-subnet and ovn-k8s-mp0 IP as some existing nodes.

Expected results:

Should have duplicated node-subnet and ovn-k8s-mp0 IP

Additional info:

Additional info can be found at the case 03329155 and the must-gather attached(comment #1) 

% omg logs ovnkube-master-v8crc -n openshift-ovn-kubernetes -c ovnkube-master | grep '2022-09-30T06:42:50.857'
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857031565Z W0930 06:42:50.857020       1 master.go:1422] Did not find any logical switches with other-config
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857112441Z I0930 06:42:50.857099       1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.131.0.0/23 fd02:0:0:4::/64] on Node worker01.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857122455Z I0930 06:42:50.857105       1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.129.4.0/23 fd02:0:0:a::/64] on Node oam04.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857130289Z I0930 06:42:50.857122       1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.131.0.0/23","fd02:0:0:4::/64"]}] on node worker01.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857140773Z I0930 06:42:50.857132       1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.129.4.0/23","fd02:0:0:a::/64"]}] on node oam04.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857166726Z I0930 06:42:50.857156       1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.128.2.0/23 fd02:0:0:5::/64] on Node oam01.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857176132Z I0930 06:42:50.857157       1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.131.0.0/23 fd02:0:0:4::/64] on Node rhel01.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857176132Z I0930 06:42:50.857167       1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.128.2.0/23","fd02:0:0:5::/64"]}] on node oam01.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857185257Z I0930 06:42:50.857157       1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.128.6.0/23 fd02:0:0:d::/64] on Node call03.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857192996Z I0930 06:42:50.857183       1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.131.0.0/23","fd02:0:0:4::/64"]}] on node rhel01.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857200017Z I0930 06:42:50.857190       1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.128.6.0/23","fd02:0:0:d::/64"]}] on node call03.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857282717Z I0930 06:42:50.857258       1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.130.2.0/23 fd02:0:0:7::/64] on Node call01.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857304886Z I0930 06:42:50.857293       1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.130.2.0/23","fd02:0:0:7::/64"]}] on node call01.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857338896Z I0930 06:42:50.857314       1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.128.4.0/23 fd02:0:0:9::/64] on Node f501.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857349485Z I0930 06:42:50.857329       1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.131.2.0/23 fd02:0:0:8::/64] on Node call02.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857371344Z I0930 06:42:50.857354       1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.128.4.0/23","fd02:0:0:9::/64"]}] on node f501.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857371344Z I0930 06:42:50.857361       1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.131.2.0/23","fd02:0:0:8::/64"]}] on node call02.ss1.samsung.local

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1415

[Updated story request]

Decision is to always display Red Hat OpenShift logo for OCP instead of conditionally. And also update the OCP login, errors, providers templates. https://openshift.github.io/oauth-templates/

Related note in comments.

[Original request]

If the ACM or the ACS dynamic plugin is enabled and there is not a custom branding set, then the default "Red Hat Openshift" branding should be shown.

This was identified as an issue during the Hybrid Console Scrum on 11/15/20201

PRs associated with this change

https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/10940 [merged]

https://github.com/openshift/oauth-templates/pull/20 [merged]

https://github.com/openshift/cluster-authentication-operator/pull/540 [merged]

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/10940

We will want to establish some basic metrics we can report back to Telemetry.

Let's consider:

• Operator installs
• Backups, created, success, error
• Restores created, success, error

Below is some background info from MTC when we added Telemetry support that may help

See:  https://github.com/konveyor/metrics-queries/blob/master/README.md

• MTC - active customers from telemetry
• Migration Toolkit - telemetry usage tracking
• MIG - Metrics Info

Design/Development info:

OpenShift Monitoring Integration Guide

Sending metrics via telemetry

Monitoring integration with OLM operators

https://www.openshift.com/blog/observability-superpower-correlation

Source Code:

https://github.com/konveyor/mig-controller/blob/master/pkg/controller/migmigration/metrics.go

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-monitoring-operator/pull/1536

Description of problem:

Pipeline list page fetches all the pipelineruns to find the last pipeline run and which results in more load time. This performance issue needs to be addressed in all the pieplines list pages wherever applicable.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.9

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create 10+ pipelines in a namespace
2. Create more number of pipelineruns under each pipeline
3. navigate to piplines list page.

Actual results:
Pipelines list will take a long time to load the list.

Expected results:

Pipeline list should not take more time to load the list.

Additional info:

Reduce the amount to data fetched to find the last pipelinerun, maybe use PartialMetadata to find the latest pipeline run and to improve the performance.

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12144

• https://github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/pull/3346

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-monitoring-operator/pull/1821

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3824. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2598. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

Liveness probe of ipsec pods fail with large clusters. Currently the command that is executed in the ipsec container is
ovs-appctl -t ovs-monitor-ipsec ipsec/status && ipsec status
The problem is with command "ipsec/status". In clusters with high node count this command will return a list with all the node daemons of the cluster. This means that as the node count raises the completion time of the command raises too. 

This makes the main command 

ovs-appctl -t ovs-monitor-ipsec

To hang until the subcommand is finished.

As the liveness and readiness probe values are hardcoded in the manifest of the ipsec container herehttps//github.com/openshift/cluster-network-operator/blob/9c1181e34316d34db49d573698d2779b008bcc20/bindata/network/ovn-kubernetes/common/ipsec.yaml] the liveness timeout of the container probe of 60 seconds start to be  insufficient as the node count list is growing. This resulted in a cluster with 170 + nodes to have 15+ ipsec pods in a crashloopbackoff state.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Openshift Container Platform 4.10 but i think the same will be visible to other versions too.

How reproducible:

I was not able to reproduce due to an extreamely high amount of resources are needed and i think that there is no point as we have spotted the issue.

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install an Openshift cluster with IPSEC enabled
2. Scale to 170+ nodes or more
3. Notice that the ipsec pods will start getting in a Crashloopbackoff state with failed Liveness/Readiness probes.

Actual results:

Ip Sec pods are stuck in a Crashloopbackoff state

Expected results:

Ip Sec pods to work normally

Additional info:

We have provided a workaround where CVO and CNO operators are scaled to 0 replicas in order for us to be able to increase the liveness probe limit to a value of 600 that recovered the cluster. 
As a next step the customer will try to reduce the node count and restore the default liveness timeout value along with bringing the operators back to see if the cluster will stabilize.

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-network-operator/pull/1640

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4489. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4168. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

Prometheus continuously restarts due to slow WAL replay

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

openshift - 4.11.13

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-monitoring-operator/pull/1845

Description of problem:

[OVN][OSP] After reboot egress node, egress IP cannot be applied anymore.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-11-07-181244

How reproducible:

Frequently happened in automation. But didn't reproduce it in manual.

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Label one node as egress node

2.
Config one egressIP object
STEP: Check  one EgressIP assigned in the object.

Nov  8 15:28:23.591: INFO: egressIPStatus: [{"egressIP":"192.168.54.72","node":"huirwang-1108c-pg2mt-worker-0-2fn6q"}]

3.
Reboot the node, wait for the node ready.

Actual results:

EgressIP cannot be applied anymore. Waited more than 1 hour.
 oc get egressip
NAME             EGRESSIPS       ASSIGNED NODE   ASSIGNED EGRESSIPS
egressip-47031   192.168.54.72    

Expected results:

The egressIP should be applied correctly.

Additional info:

Some logs
E1108 07:29:41.849149       1 egressip.go:1635] No assignable nodes found for EgressIP: egressip-47031 and requested IPs: [192.168.54.72]
I1108 07:29:41.849288       1 event.go:285] Event(v1.ObjectReference{Kind:"EgressIP", Namespace:"", Name:"egressip-47031", UID:"", APIVersion:"", ResourceVersion:"", FieldPath:""}): type: 'Warning' reason: 'NoMatchingNodeFound' no assignable nodes for EgressIP: egressip-47031, please tag at least one node with label: k8s.ovn.org/egress-assignable


W1108 07:33:37.401149       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:162] Could not connect to huirwang-1108c-pg2mt-worker-0-2fn6q (10.131.0.2:9107): context deadline exceeded
I1108 07:33:37.401348       1 master.go:1364] Adding or Updating Node "huirwang-1108c-pg2mt-worker-0-2fn6q"
I1108 07:33:37.437465       1 egressip_healthcheck.go:168] Connected to huirwang-1108c-pg2mt-worker-0-2fn6q (10.131.0.2:9107)

After this log, seems like no logs related to "192.168.54.72" happened.

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1445